Raoul Pal warns Anthropic could lose customers over Claude AI performance
Raoul Pal criticized Anthropic’s Claude AI for slow performance and flawed reasoning, warning of potential customer loss. The comments follow broader disputes involving CEO Dario Amodei on regulation and accusations of data theft from Chinese rivals.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Macro investor Raoul Pal has publicly criticized Anthropic’s Claude AI model for severe performance issues, warning that the company faces a risk of customer attrition unless it rapidly expands its computing infrastructure.
Pal took to X on Monday to detail his experience, stating that the AI assistant had become difficult to use. He reported wasting hours on tasks that required approximately 30 minutes to complete, describing the service as "utterly unusable."
Performance and Usage Concerns
Pal highlighted specific technical failures in the model’s operation. He noted that the reasoning capabilities were flawed and that the system frequently failed to execute assigned tasks correctly.
The investor also pointed to restrictive usage limits as a barrier. Despite characterizing himself as "hardly a heavy user," Pal stated he exhausts his weekly credits by Monday. He specifically cited issues with the Opus 5 and Fable 5 models, describing the former negatively and complaining about the cost associated with the latter.
"They need more inference and fast or they’re gonna lose a lot of customers," Pal said, urging Anthropic to resolve the bottlenecks quickly.
Regulatory and Competitive Context
This criticism emerges amid broader disputes involving Anthropic’s leadership and market position. CEO Dario Amodei recently pushed back against investor Gavin Baker regarding views on AI regulation. Baker had claimed Amodei suggested Anthropic could eventually become the world’s only private company, a statement Anthropic employee Sholto Douglas called "completely false."
Additionally, Anthropic has faced security allegations in the competitive AI landscape. The company accused Chinese firms DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax of conducting industrial-scale distillation campaigns on Claude involving more than 24,000 accounts and 16 million interactions. Tesla CEO Elon Musk countered these claims by accusing Anthropic of having previously stolen training data at scale.
How might Anthropic's current infrastructure bottlenecks impact its ability to retain enterprise clients against competitors like OpenAI and Google?
Will the allegations of industrial-scale model distillation by Chinese firms lead to stricter API usage policies or legal actions from Anthropic?
Could Elon Musk's counter-accusations regarding data theft damage Anthropic's reputation for ethical AI development among institutional investors?

































