HCLTech-backed study shows high AI confidence but limited TMT impact
A new report by Economist Enterprise, supported by HCLTech, analyzes AI adoption in the TMT sector based on 200+ executive interviews. It finds that while 91% of firms see results from AI, only 33% can measure value, with low rates of upskilling (20%) and governance (17%).

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
HCL Technologies Limited announced on July 27, 2026, the release of a new research report conducted by Economist Enterprise, examining the widening gap between executive confidence and measurable business impact regarding artificial intelligence in the Telecom, Media, Semiconductor and Technology (TMT) industry. The findings indicate that while optimism regarding AI’s potential is widespread, the ability to translate this into quantifiable value remains limited, posing a strategic challenge for organizations aiming to industrialize AI capabilities beyond experimentation.
The report, titled The Value Edge: Powering the Next Era of TMT, draws on insights from more than 200 C-suite executives across telecom, media, technology, and semiconductor organizations in the U.S. and Europe. It identifies an "AI value paradox" where 91% of organizations believe their AI investments are delivering results, yet only one-third can measure the business value created. This discrepancy raises critical questions about how organizations can unlock AI's full potential without consistent mechanisms to quantify the value it generates.
Key Findings from the Research
The study highlights several structural gaps in current AI adoption strategies within the TMT ecosystem. As AI accelerates convergence across traditional industry boundaries, companies are forced to rethink competitive landscapes where competitors, partners, and adjacent verticals merge to create new sources of growth. However, the transition from experimentation to scaled adoption faces significant hurdles related to talent and governance.
| Metric | Percentage | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Belief in AI Results | 91% | High executive confidence in investment efficacy |
| Measurable Business Value | 33% | Only one-third can quantify actual impact |
| AI Upskilling Strategy | 20% | Low preparedness for talent development |
| Active AI Governance | 17% | Minimal oversight shaping system operations |
Despite rapid deployment of AI tools, only 20% of organizations currently have a strategy for AI upskilling or hiring within their AI initiatives, even though talent upskilling ranks as the top future AI investment priority. Furthermore, only 17% report that governance is actively shaping how their AI systems operate, suggesting a lack of disciplined oversight in critical infrastructure decisions.
Strategic Outlook and Industry Convergence
Charlotte Bullard Davies, Principal, Research Methods & Innovation at Economist Enterprise, noted that industry leaders recognize AI's ability to unlock new revenue models and strengthen customer relationships. She emphasized that organizations combining strategic focus, ecosystem collaboration, and disciplined governance will be best positioned for future growth.
Anil Ganjoo, Chief Growth Officer and Global Head of Telecom, Media and Technology at HCLTech, stated that the boundaries separating TMT sectors are dissolving as AI becomes embedded across every layer of the value chain. He argued that the next era of competitive advantage will belong to organizations that move beyond experimentation toward industrialization, leveraging AI investments to deliver measurable impact and differentiated experiences.
What the Numbers Show
The data reveals a distinct divergence between perception and operational reality in the TMT sector. The high belief rate (91%) contrasted with low measurability (33%) suggests that many organizations may be conflating activity with outcome. Without robust metrics, companies risk over-investing in AI initiatives that do not contribute to bottom-line performance. Additionally, the low adoption of upskilling strategies (20%) indicates a potential bottleneck in scaling AI efforts, as human capital readiness lags behind technological deployment.
Historical Stock Returns for HCL Technologies
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.96% | +7.64% | +16.34% | -24.67% | -14.02% | +29.55% |
How might the widening gap between executive AI optimism and measurable ROI impact HCL Technologies' stock valuation and investor sentiment in the coming quarters?
What specific governance frameworks are emerging as industry standards to help TMT companies bridge the 17% adoption gap in active AI oversight?
Could the lack of structured upskilling strategies (currently at 20%) lead to a significant talent shortage that bottlenecks AI industrialization across the sector by 2027?


































