Hasti Finance submits voting results for 32nd AGM, all resolutions pass
- Hasti Finance Ltd submitted voting results for its 32nd AGM held on September 30, 2026
- All three resolutions, including director re-appointments, passed with requisite majority
- Public non-institutional shareholders cast 28,373 votes against director re-appointments
- Promoter group recorded significant invalid votes during e-voting for specific resolutions

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Hasti Finance Limited submitted the consolidated scrutinizer report and voting results for its 32nd Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on September 30, 2026. The filing confirms that all ordinary and special resolutions proposed at the meeting were passed with the requisite majority.
The AGM was conducted via video conferencing and other audio-visual means. Remote e-voting commenced on September 27, 2026, and concluded on September 29, 2026. Deepika Mishra & Associates served as the scrutinizer for the electronic voting process.
Resolution outcomes
The company sought shareholder approval for three key items of business. The adoption of financial statements received overwhelming support from both promoter and public shareholders. Re-appointments of directors also secured necessary votes, despite some invalid votes recorded in the promoter category.
| Resolution | Type | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of FY26 financials | Ordinary | 5,323,738 | 28,373 | Passed |
| Re-appointment of Sonal Nitin Somani | Ordinary | 2,744,070 | 28,373 | Passed |
| Re-appointment of Nitin Prabhudas Somani | Special | 3,301,842 | 28,373 | Passed |
Voting participation details
Public non-institutional shareholders voted against the re-appointment resolutions with 28,373 votes each. This represents approximately 5.64% of the votes polled by this category. Promoter and promoter group members cast no votes against any resolution.
For the re-appointment of Mrs. Sonal Nitin Somani, promoter group votes polled were 2,269,291 out of 4,948,064 shares held. Invalid votes in this category stood at 2,579,668. Similarly, for the special resolution regarding Mr. Nitin Prabhudas Somani, promoter group votes polled were 2,827,063, with 2,021,896 invalid votes recorded.
What the numbers show
The voting data reveals a distinct pattern in public shareholder behavior versus promoter alignment. While promoters voted unanimously in favor across all resolutions, public non-institutional shareholders maintained a consistent dissent rate of 5.64% against the director re-appointments. This suggests a specific reservation among retail investors regarding the board composition, even as the overall outcome remained favorable due to the high concentration of promoter-held shares.
Historical Stock Returns for Hasti Finance
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0% | -5.26% | +1.25% | 0.0% | -4.37% | 0.0% |
How might the 5.64% dissent rate among public shareholders regarding director re-appointments influence Hasti Finance's future corporate governance reforms or board composition strategies?
What specific operational or strategic changes can investors expect from the newly re-appointed directors, Sonal Nitin Somani and Nitin Prabhudas Somani, in the upcoming fiscal year?
Given the high volume of invalid votes from the promoter group, will Hasti Finance implement stricter internal controls or communication protocols to improve voting accuracy in future AGMs?





























