Music Broadcast Limited Secures Major Victory in Madras High Court Litigation
Music Broadcast Limited secured a significant legal victory when the Division Bench of Madras High Court delivered a favorable judgment on December 10, 2025, setting aside contempt orders and ruling that contempt jurisdiction was not maintainable in the ongoing copyright dispute, with no financial obligations surviving for the company.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Music Broadcast Limited , the company behind Radio City, has secured a significant legal victory with the Division Bench of the Madras High Court delivering a favorable judgment on December 10, 2025. The court's decision has set aside multiple contempt orders and ruled that contempt jurisdiction was not maintainable in the ongoing copyright dispute.
Court Delivers Favorable Judgment
The Division Bench of the Madras High Court, through its common judgment dated December 10, 2025, allowed the Letters Patent Appeals filed by the company and set aside orders dated July 31, 2024, and August 26, 2025, in contempt petitions passed by the Single Judge of Madras High Court.
| Court Details: | Information |
|---|---|
| Court: | Division Bench, Madras High Court |
| Judgment Date: | December 10, 2025 |
| Case Type: | Letters Patent Appeals |
| Outcome: | Appeals Allowed |
Key Rulings in Company's Favor
The court's judgment delivered several crucial rulings that benefit Music Broadcast Limited:
Relief from Financial Obligations: The directions issued by the Single Judge, including the requirement to deposit 50% of the alleged royalty dues and the requirement to furnish historical music play logs and compute alleged royalty amounts, have been set aside and no such obligations survive.
Contempt Jurisdiction Ruling: The court held that contempt jurisdiction was not maintainable in the present facts, particularly as the underlying order in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals is presently under consideration before the Supreme Court and the alleged monetary liability is unquantified.
No Financial Impact: According to the company's disclosure, no financial impact arises from the impugned contempt orders, which have now been set aside.
Background of the Litigation
The litigation stems from a complex copyright dispute involving music licensing fees. The case involves multiple parties including Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) and South Indian Music Companies Association (SIMCA), with the core issue being the determination of royalty rates for music broadcasting.
| Litigation Timeline: | Key Events |
|---|---|
| Original Case: | Copyright Board proceedings |
| High Court Appeals: | Civil Miscellaneous Appeals |
| Supreme Court: | Matter under consideration |
| Current Status: | Contempt orders set aside |
The Copyright Board had initially fixed licensing fees, which were subsequently challenged through various appeals. The Madras High Court had earlier passed a judgment in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, which is currently under consideration before the Supreme Court.
Court's Reasoning
The Division Bench emphasized that when the amount has not been quantified in the final judgment and the original order is under challenge before the Supreme Court, contempt jurisdiction cannot be invoked. The court noted that the proper remedy would be to file an application for issuance of certificate under Section 75 of the Copyright Act, 1957, so that the order could be treated as a decree of the Civil Court.
Regulatory Compliance
Music Broadcast Limited has made this disclosure in compliance with Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company has stated that it will continue to provide updates on any material developments in this matter.
This favorable judgment provides significant relief to Music Broadcast Limited by removing the immediate financial obligations imposed through the contempt proceedings while the main case remains under consideration by the Supreme Court.
Historical Stock Returns for Music Broadcast
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.45% | +1.69% | -4.62% | -27.12% | -46.35% | -71.20% |







































