MPS Infotecnics Gets Court Relief in SEBI Dispute
The Delhi High Court has disposed of MPS's writ petition against SEBI and market intermediaries regarding custodial charges. The court directed SEBI and other respondents to consider the petition as a representation and make appropriate decisions. MPS sought relief against custodial charging policies, including charges based on trading value, revised structure for distressed companies, and quashing of specific SEBI circulars. The case involved SEBI, CDSL, NSDL, NSE, and BSE as respondents.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
MPS has received a significant development in its legal dispute with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and other market intermediaries regarding custodial charges. The Delhi High Court has disposed of the company's writ petition with specific directions.
Court Proceedings and Outcome
The Delhi High Court disposed of MPS's writ petition against SEBI and market intermediaries regarding custodial charges. The court directed the respondents to consider the petition as a representation.
| Case Details | Information |
|---|---|
| Petition Number | WP(C) 18640/2025 |
| Court | Delhi High Court |
Key Relief Sought by Company
MPS had approached the court seeking comprehensive relief against what it termed as inequitable custodial charging policies. The company's primary demands included:
- Direction to create custodial charges based on trading value of shares rather than fixed amounts
- Revision of custodial charging structure for financially distressed companies
- Special consideration for companies where share value falls below nominal value
- Quashing of specific SEBI circulars dating back to 2005, 2011, and 2015
- Withdrawal of notices issued by NSE and BSE
Court's Direction and Next Steps
The court directed SEBI and other respondents to consider the writ petition as a representation and take appropriate decisions thereon, with intimation to the petitioner. This approach allows the regulatory authorities to review the company's concerns through administrative channels rather than judicial intervention.
| Respondents in Case | Role |
|---|---|
| SEBI | Primary regulator |
| CDSL | Depository services |
| NSDL | Depository services |
| NSE | Stock exchange |
| BSE | Stock exchange |
Background of Dispute
The company had initially filed the writ petition challenging the existing custodial charge structure. MPS argued that the current policy is particularly burdensome for companies undergoing financial distress, especially where share values have declined significantly below their nominal values.
The company specifically contested SEBI circulars issued in January 2005, April 2011, and December 2015, claiming they violated fundamental principles under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Additionally, it sought withdrawal of notices issued by NSE and BSE.
Regulatory Compliance
MPS has maintained transparency throughout the legal proceedings, filing appropriate disclosures under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
The court's direction provides the company an opportunity to have its concerns addressed through regulatory channels while maintaining the legal framework for further recourse if needed.
Historical Stock Returns for MPS
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.79% | +0.40% | -0.30% | -23.76% | +0.06% | +457.90% |







































