Future Market Networks' Arbitration Challenge Dismissed by Calcutta High Court
Future Market Networks Limited (FMNL) faced a setback as the Calcutta High Court dismissed its application challenging a 2016 arbitration award. The dispute with Laxmipat Surana stemmed from a licensing agreement termination. The court upheld the arbitrator's decision, which included awards for license fees during a 5-year lock-in period, loss of interest on security deposit, additional license fees, and utility charges. FMNL's objections were found to be without merit, with the court stating that the arbitrator correctly interpreted the contract terms. The company intends to appeal the decision.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Future Market Networks Limited (FMNL) faced a setback as the Calcutta High Court dismissed its application challenging an arbitration award dated May 19, 2016. The court's decision upholds the arbitrator's ruling in a dispute between FMNL and Laxmipat Surana, stemming from a licensing agreement termination.
Key Points of the Dispute
The company contested the award on four main grounds:
- License fees for a 5-year lock-in period totaling Rs. 13,26,56,751.00
- Loss of interest on security deposit of Rs. 50,00,000.00
- Additional license fees of Rs. 3,95,50,500.00
- Electricity charges of Rs. 14,68,762.00 and water charges of Rs. 11,70,000.00
Court's Ruling
The Calcutta High Court, in its judgment, supported the arbitrator's decision, stating that the arbitrator had correctly interpreted the contract terms and stayed within the scope of reference. The court found no merit in FMNL's objections and dismissed the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Dispute Background
The conflict arose from a licensing agreement between Future Market Networks and Laxmipat Surana. FMNL terminated the agreement without providing the required 30-day notice as stipulated in the contract. This led to the arbitration proceedings and subsequent award in favor of Surana.
Court's Observations
Lock-in Period: The court upheld the arbitrator's decision to award license fees for the entire 5-year lock-in period, rejecting FMNL's argument that fees should only be awarded until March 2012.
Additional Claims: The court also supported the arbitrator's award for loss of interest on security deposit and additional license fees, finding them within the scope of the arbitration reference.
Utility Charges: The electricity and water charges awarded by the arbitrator were deemed appropriate and within the contractual terms.
Legal Implications
The court's decision emphasizes the importance of adhering to contractual obligations, particularly notice periods in termination clauses. It also reinforces the principle that arbitral awards will be upheld unless they are found to be perverse or contrary to the evidence or in conflict with public policy.
Future Market Networks' Response
Future Market Networks Limited has stated its intention to file an appeal against this decision, indicating that the legal battle may continue in higher courts.
This case highlights the complexities of commercial lease agreements and the significant financial implications that can arise from disputes over termination and lock-in periods in the real estate sector.
Historical Stock Returns for Future Market Networks
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.49% | -1.50% | -13.28% | -30.42% | -51.16% | -42.17% |





























