FNPO Proposes Multi-Level Fitment Factor of 3.0-3.25 and 5% Annual Increment for 8th Pay Commission
FNPO has submitted comprehensive 8th Pay Commission recommendations proposing differentiated fitment factors from 3.0-3.25 across employee levels and replacing the current 3% annual increment with 5%. The National Council will meet on 15 February to consolidate proposals from employee bodies before forwarding recommendations to Commission Chairperson Ranjana Prakash Desai.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Federation of National Postal Organisation (FNPO) has submitted detailed recommendations for the upcoming 8th Pay Commission, proposing significant changes to the current pay structure for central government employees. The comprehensive 60-page letter, prepared by FNPO Secretary General Sivaji Vasireddy, outlines proposals for multi-level fitment factors, enhanced annual increments, and structural improvements to benefit millions of government employees.
Proposed Fitment Factor Structure
FNPO has recommended a differentiated fitment factor approach, arguing that previous pay commissions failed to apply consistent fitment factors across all employee levels. The organisation has proposed fitment factors ranging from 3.0 to 3.25 based on the Akroyd formula, with higher factors for senior positions:
| Employee Level | Proposed Fitment Factor |
|---|---|
| Level 1 to Level 5 | 3.0 |
| Level 6 to Level 9 | 3.05 |
| Level 10 to Level 12 | 3.1 |
| Level 13 to Level 13A | 3.05 |
| Level 14 to Level 15 | 3.15 |
| Level 16 | 3.2 |
| Level 17 to Level 18 | 3.25 |
This graduated approach aims to address inconsistencies in previous pay commission implementations while ensuring equitable treatment across different employee categories.
Annual Increment Enhancement
The FNPO proposal seeks to replace the current 3% annual increment system with a 5% annual increment structure. The organisation argues this enhancement would deliver multiple benefits:
- Meaningful financial progression for employees
- Reduced stagnation-related dissatisfaction
- Alignment of government pay structures with industry standards
- Particular benefit for Group C and Group D employees who have limited promotion opportunities compared to Group A and B level employees
Implementation Timeline and Process
The National Council (Joint Consultative Machinery, Staff Side) is scheduled to conduct a meeting with draft committee members on 15 February, following receipt of recommendations from various central government employee bodies. After consolidating all proposals, the NCJCM will prepare a final draft for submission to 8th Pay Commission Chairperson Ranjana Prakash Desai.
Continuity of Matrix System
FNPO has recommended maintaining the 7th Pay Commission matrix system, citing its effectiveness in bringing clarity and predictability to pay fixation and progression processes. The organisation's comprehensive proposal also addresses various other aspects including higher pay scales, pay structure modifications, allowances, and promotion policies.
The recommendations represent a coordinated effort by central government employee organisations to secure improved compensation structures that reflect current economic conditions and industry benchmarks.































