Autoline Industries Limited Receives Adverse Judgment of USD 1,037,903.38 from Oakland County Circuit Court
Autoline Industries Limited received an adverse judgment of USD 1,037,903.38 plus interest and attorney fees from Oakland County Circuit Court, Michigan on February 17, 2026. The ruling favored CJ Holdings North America, LLC in a dispute over an unpaid settlement amount of USD 470,000 from a 2017 agreement. The company is analyzing the judgment and considering legal strategies, noting that enforcement in India would require fresh judicial proceedings.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Autoline Industries Limited has disclosed receiving an adverse judgment from the Oakland County Circuit Court in Michigan, concluding litigation that began with a complaint filed by CJ Holdings North America, LLC. The company informed stock exchanges about this development under Regulation 30 of SEBI listing requirements on February 19, 2026.
Court Judgment Details
The Oakland County Circuit Court passed its judgment on February 17, 2026, which the company received on February 18, 2026. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, CJ Holdings North America, LLC, awarding significant financial damages to the company.
| Judgment Component: | Amount/Rate |
|---|---|
| Principal Amount: | USD 1,037,903.38 |
| Simple Interest: | 6% per annum |
| Default Interest: | 0.50% per month (compounded) |
| Additional Costs: | Attorney fees |
Background of the Dispute
The litigation originated from a settlement agreement that Autoline Industries entered into with CJ Holdings North America, LLC on April 18, 2017. Under this agreement, the company committed to paying USD 1,700,000 to settle the plaintiff's claims, subject to Reserve Bank of India approval for payment in tranches.
| Settlement Details: | Amount (USD) |
|---|---|
| Total Settlement Amount: | 1,700,000 |
| Amount Already Paid: | 1,230,000 |
| Outstanding Amount: | 470,000 |
Following RBI approval, the company successfully paid USD 1,230,000 to the plaintiff. However, USD 470,000 remained unpaid, leading to the current legal proceedings and subsequent judgment.
Enforcement and Next Steps
The company has clarified that this judgment from a non-reciprocating territory is not directly executable in India. The enforcement would require a fresh judicial process in India through the institution of a new suit, following jurisdictional and procedural rules applicable to original suits under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Autoline Industries stated that it is currently analyzing the judgment and developing its strategy, including consideration of the domestication process for the foreign judgment. The company's management is evaluating various legal options available under Indian law for addressing this international court ruling.
Regulatory Compliance
The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015, and SEBI Circular dated January 30, 2026. The company had previously disclosed brief details of this litigation to stock exchanges on November 20, 2024, when the complaint was initially filed by the plaintiff.
This development represents a significant legal and financial challenge for Autoline Industries Limited as it navigates the complexities of international litigation and potential enforcement proceedings in India.
Historical Stock Returns for Autoline Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.99% | -1.81% | +11.24% | +2.61% | +2.73% | +144.29% |


































