Eisman says AI CEOs fake doomsday crisis; Anthropic weighs new model
- Steve Eisman claims AI CEOs are faking a doomsday crisis to protect pricing power
- Anthropic is weighing a new model to counter OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra amid rising competition
- OpenAI’s Astra holds 13% of enterprise AI spending vs Anthropic’s 8%
- Polymarket gives Anthropic a 78% chance of an IPO by December 31
- Anthropic’s annualized revenue run rate exceeded $65 billion by end of July

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Big Short investor Steve Eisman claims AI executives are manufacturing a "doomsday crisis" to protect their businesses, as competitive pressure mounts on Anthropic to release a new model.
Eisman argued on Friday that companies like Anthropic and OpenAI cannot afford to slow down despite public calls for caution, citing hundreds of billions of dollars in commitments to hyperscalers. He suggested the push for regulation is designed to establish barriers to entry and preserve pricing power against cheaper alternatives.
Competitive Pressure on Anthropic
Anthropic is evaluating a new model aimed at countering OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra, according to Reuters. This development comes days after CEO Dario Amodei called for the industry to slow improvements in AI capabilities, a stance backed by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
The competitive landscape is shifting rapidly. OpenAI’s Astra accounted for about 13% of enterprise AI spending tracked by Ramp, compared with 8% for Anthropic’s Claude Fable. Additionally, OpenAI overtook Anthropic last week on OpenRouter, marking the first time it led in spending there in more than two-and-a-half years.
Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ: META), one of Anthropic’s largest customers, is looking to reduce its reliance on Anthropic models as it builds internal AI capabilities. Meta recently launched Muse, its first personal AI agent, powered by its most capable model to date.
Eisman’s Moat Argument
Eisman stated there are "no pricing moats" in the business, noting that open-weight models allow developers to download and run systems independently. He expects these models to drive a price war, challenging the sustainability of proprietary systems.
He warned that if Anthropic or OpenAI were to fail, the broader AI infrastructure buildout, including Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ: NVDA), could face significant disruption. Nvidia is considering investing up to $10 billion as an anchor investor in Anthropic’s planned IPO.
IPO Details and Market Sentiment
Anthropic is preparing what could be the largest IPO ever, potentially raising $100 billion at a valuation around $2 trillion. This would roughly double its $965 billion valuation from a May funding round.
Polymarket traders give Anthropic a 78% chance of going public by December 31, with about $3.7 million traded on the timing market. Reuters reported Anthropic may wait until after November’s U.S. midterm elections to list.
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Potential Valuation | $2 trillion | Reuters |
| Potential Raise | $100 billion | Reuters |
| May Funding Valuation | $965 billion | Reuters |
| IPO Probability by Dec 31 | 78% | Polymarket |
| Annualized Revenue Run Rate | >$65 billion | Reuters |
What the Numbers Show
Anthropic’s annualized revenue run rate exceeded $65 billion by the end of July, up from roughly $9 billion at the end of 2025. This rapid growth contrasts with Eisman’s warning of impending price wars driven by open-weight models and competitors like OpenAI. The divergence between high market confidence in a successful listing and the intensifying competitive pressure highlights the risk to future margins if pricing power erodes.
How might the anticipated price war driven by open-weight models impact Anthropic's ability to justify a $2 trillion valuation at IPO?
What specific regulatory barriers could Anthropic and OpenAI successfully establish to protect their pricing power against cheaper alternatives?
If Meta continues to shift toward internal AI capabilities like Muse, how will this affect Anthropic's enterprise revenue growth trajectory?



























