Michael Burry calls OpenAI, Anthropic slowdown plea self-serving IPO hype
- Michael Burry labels OpenAI and Anthropic's AI slowdown calls as self-serving hype for IPOs
- Burry argues large language models are not true AI or AGI, so there is nothing to slow down
- OpenAI rules out a 2026 IPO citing safety challenges, while Anthropic targets October listing
- Anthropic expects positive adjusted operating income for a second consecutive quarter
- Dario Amodei cites China as the toughest dilemma for global AI speed limits

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Investor Michael Burry has criticized executives from OpenAI and Anthropic for advocating a slowdown in artificial intelligence development, labeling the stance as self-serving. On Monday, Burry argued that such calls benefit incumbent companies and generate necessary hype for upcoming initial public offerings.
Burry stated on X that "IPOs need hype & puffery," adding that claims of being "so awesome it could become dangerous" constitute such puffery. He further argued that large language models are not true AI and will not achieve artificial general intelligence, meaning there is nothing substantive to slow down. Burry suggested these narratives mask an uncontrollable slowing of growth as companies prepare for public listings.
OpenAI Delays IPO, Anthropic Pushes Ahead
OpenAI has ruled out an IPO in 2026, with CEO Sam Altman describing the timing as ill-advised due to ongoing safety and alignment challenges. In contrast, Anthropic reportedly chose Nasdaq for its planned October IPO. The company expects to post positive adjusted operating income for a second consecutive quarter and forecasts gross margins above 80% before accounting for distribution costs and AI model training expenses.
Former White House AI and Crypto Czar David Sacks joined the debate, arguing that if OpenAI and Anthropic believe their next models are too risky, they should slow down themselves without requiring lawmakers or regulators to pace the frontier.
The China Factor in AI Slowdown Efforts
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei expressed concerns over China’s role in the global AI landscape, calling it the "toughest dilemma" in implementing a global speed limit. Amodei warned that military and strategic advantages create powerful incentives for countries to accelerate development, though he acknowledged a global speed limit would be difficult to achieve.
Dan Ives, Partner and Senior Managing Director at Yorkville Ives, countered that China is unlikely to slow down despite self-regulation calls. He noted that the pace of innovation will remain a focus for the tech industry and Beltway, with sovereign AI playing a key role.
How might the divergent IPO timelines of OpenAI and Anthropic influence investor sentiment and valuation benchmarks for the broader AI sector?
What specific regulatory measures could lawmakers implement if industry self-regulation fails to address safety concerns raised by executives?
How will the 'China factor' impact global cooperation efforts, and could it lead to a fragmented AI governance landscape between Western nations and China?

































