Goldman, Morgan Stanley split teams for OpenAI, Anthropic IPOs
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are forming separate teams to handle potential IPOs by OpenAI and Anthropic, aiming to prevent sensitive information from crossing between the rival AI firms. This approach differs from typical IPO playbooks where lead banks avoid representing two rivals simultaneously. Both companies submitted confidential IPO filings in June, but no definitive timeline has been set, with OpenAI indicating a public offering may not be imminent.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are organizing separate banking teams to work on potential stock market debuts by OpenAI and Anthropic. The move aims to prevent sensitive information from crossing between the two direct competitors. The two banks reportedly expect to be involved with both transactions while keeping the coverage groups walled off from one another.
The setup departs from typical IPO playbooks, in which a lead bank usually avoids representing two rivals going to market simultaneously. The banks are assigning different bankers to each mandate, even as both offerings are expected to include broad syndicates with multiple firms.
Historical Context
During the 2019 IPOs of Lyft and Uber, the work was divided among different lead underwriters rather than shared by the same top banks. JPMorgan Chase, Credit Suisse, and Jefferies led Lyft's deal, while Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America handled Uber's IPO.
IPO Timeline and Challenges
Both OpenAI and Anthropic submitted confidential IPO filings earlier in June, which can keep documents out of public view while companies gauge timing. Neither company has set a definitive timeline for its IPO debut. The earliest scenario discussed was August, though expectations have shifted toward a period after early September.
OpenAI has suggested a public offering may not be imminent because it wants to complete certain priorities while staying private. "We have not decided on timing yet; it may be a while because there are things we want to do that are likely easier as a private company. But it's a complicated set of tradeoffs and this gives us the option to go public sooner if that ends up being best," a statement read.
Meanwhile, Anthropic is contending with policy and regulatory complications, including U.S. government limits on foreign access to newer models and an unresolved disagreement tied to a Pentagon designation.
How will the unique arrangement of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley representing both OpenAI and Anthropic influence investor confidence and IPO pricing?
What impact could OpenAI's and Anthropic's delayed IPO timelines have on the broader tech IPO market and investor sentiment?
How might regulatory challenges, such as U.S. government limits on foreign access to AI models, affect Anthropic's IPO prospects and valuation?

































