FMCG Distributors' Body Urges SEBI To Halt IPOs Of Loss-Making Quick-Commerce Firms
The All India Consumer Products Distributors Federation has formally requested SEBI to pause IPO approvals for loss-making quick-commerce companies until Competition Commission proceedings are resolved. The federation, representing over 4.50 lakh distributors and 1.30 crore retail outlets, highlights concerns about business models sustained by continuous capital infusions despite large cumulative losses and negative cash flows, citing examples of Zomato and Swiggy where early investors exited while losses persisted.
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The All India Consumer Products Distributors Federation (AICPDF) has formally requested the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to temporarily halt Initial Public Offerings of loss-making quick-commerce companies, citing significant concerns about investor protection and the broader impact on India's retail ecosystem. The federation, which represents over 4.50 lakh distributors and more than 1.30 crore kirana and retail outlets across India, has submitted a detailed representation to the market regulator outlining these concerns.
Key Demands and Regulatory Concerns
In its representation to SEBI, AICPDF has specifically requested immediate measures including a temporary pause on IPO approvals for quick-commerce and closely related e-commerce companies. The federation emphasizes that this pause should remain in effect until ongoing proceedings before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) are conclusively resolved.
| Concern Area: | Details |
|---|---|
| Representation Coverage: | Over 4.50 lakh distributors and 1.30 crore retail outlets |
| Regulatory Request: | Temporary pause on quick-commerce IPO approvals |
| Pending Proceedings: | Active CCI investigations on predatory pricing |
| Primary Risk: | Protection of small retail investors |
The federation argues that proceeding with IPO approvals while competition-law investigations remain active raises serious concerns regarding material disclosure, regulatory arbitrage, and investor protection.
Business Model Sustainability Issues
AICPDF has highlighted fundamental concerns about the sustainability of quick-commerce business models currently seeking public listings. Several quick-commerce companies continue to operate with large cumulative losses, negative operating cash flows, and unproven unit-level profitability. These business models are sustained primarily through repeated infusions of private capital, which are used to fund consumer subsidies, discounts, and capital-intensive dark-store and logistics infrastructure.
The federation emphasizes that despite the absence of demonstrated profitability, valuations for these companies are often built on gross merchandise value and market share rather than traditional financial metrics such as earnings or free cash flow.
Market Examples and Investor Exit Patterns
AICPDF has cited recent listings in the sector by Zomato and Swiggy to illustrate concerning trends in the quick-commerce space. Both companies listed after years of sustained losses, with IPO structures that allowed significant exits by early shareholders. The federation notes that large venture and institutional investors monetized their stakes either at the time of listing or through post-listing sales, even as the companies continued to report substantial losses and negative operating cash flows.
| Company Pattern: | Market Behavior |
|---|---|
| Listing Status: | After years of sustained losses |
| Early Investor Exits: | Significant stake monetization at listing |
| Ongoing Performance: | Continued substantial losses post-listing |
| Cash Flow Status: | Negative operating cash flows |
Competition Commission Proceedings
The federation has already filed formal complaints before the Competition Commission of India alleging predatory pricing and anti-competitive conduct by quick-commerce platforms. These proceedings remain active and unresolved, with the CCI having sought additional evidence from the parties involved.
AICPDF argues that the ongoing nature of these competition law investigations creates additional complexity for potential IPO approvals, particularly regarding material disclosure requirements and investor protection standards.
Industry Impact and Regulatory Appeal
Dhairyashil Patil, National President of AICPDF, emphasized the broader implications of allowing these IPOs to proceed without proper regulatory oversight. He stated that India's capital markets must not become exit routes for business models that are structurally loss-making and sustained only by continuous cash burn.
"When early investors exit through IPOs while losses persist, the risk is unfairly transferred to small retail investors. At the same time, predatory pricing funded through investor money is destroying lakhs of kirana livelihoods. SEBI has a constitutional responsibility to ensure transparency, fairness, and investor protection. We urge the regulator to intervene decisively before irreversible damage is done to both investors and India's retail ecosystem," Patil said.
The organization has called upon SEBI to exercise its constitutional responsibility to ensure transparency, fairness, and investor protection through decisive regulatory intervention before irreversible damage occurs to both investors and India's retail ecosystem.
15
