White House split on AI regulation as Sacks, tech CEOs push light touch
- White House split over AI regulation with Sacks pushing light touch against security concerns from Wiles and Bessent
- Trump signed scaled-back executive order after initial plan was abandoned due to internal pressure
- Anthropic’s Mythos model and Hugging Face hack cited as major national security warning signs
- Nvidia’s Jensen Huang and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg oppose coordinated slowdowns while Elon Musk supports safeguards
- China’s state security minister warns AI could threaten political stability via deepfakes and data exposure

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
President Donald Trump’s administration faces a growing internal divide over artificial intelligence regulation. Advisers urge caution over security risks while David Sacks and major tech executives advocate for a lighter regulatory approach.
White House Officials Raise AI Security Concerns
The disagreement intensified in May after Sacks persuaded Trump to abandon a planned executive order that would have given the government a longer window to review powerful AI models, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent were reportedly caught off guard by the decision. Bessent has raised concerns that AI-powered cyberattacks could disrupt the nation’s banking system.
At Wiles and Bessent’s urging, Trump later signed a scaled-back version of the order. Since then, Wiles, Bessent and other officials have reportedly held frequent discussions about AI risks and potential safeguards. White House officials have also spoken with executives at OpenAI and Anthropic about their concerns.
Mythos, AI Agents Raise Alarm
Anthropic’s Mythos model reportedly became a major warning sign for officials after they recognized its potential to facilitate sophisticated cyberattacks and create national-security risks. A senior administration official described the model as a "red flashing light."
Concerns grew further after an OpenAI incident in which hundreds of AI agents acted in coordination during a hack of Hugging Face. Officials have since examined potential threats involving critical infrastructure, including water and power systems, as well as the possible use of AI in biological weapons development.
Sacks, Tech CEOs Push Back on Regulation
Sacks has continued advocating limited government intervention, saying existing product-liability and fraud laws are largely sufficient for AI models. "It is the responsibility of these companies to maintain control of their products," Sacks said Wednesday at a Politico event.
Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ: NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang and Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: META) CEO Mark Zuckerberg have pushed back against calls for coordinated AI slowdowns and additional regulation. Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) and Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (NASDAQ: SPCX) CEO Elon Musk, meanwhile, has supported calls for greater AI safeguards.
Trump has maintained that the U.S. must accelerate AI development to compete with China. On Truth Social, he wrote: "WHOEVER WINS AI, WINS!"
White House spokeswoman Liz Huston told the publication that the administration remains committed to "unleashing American innovation" while supporting the safe deployment of advanced AI and protecting national security. The White House did not immediately respond to Benzinga’s request for comment.
China Warns AI Could Threaten Political Stability
Meanwhile, Chen Yixin, China’s minister of state security, has warned that AI could pose a direct threat to the Chinese Communist Party’s hold on power. Chen’s concerns reportedly include deepfakes and AI-generated content that could disrupt political stability, as well as the potential exposure of sensitive information through foreign AI models.
Former Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Barack Obama have also voiced support for slowing the pace of AI development.
How might the administration's pivot toward lighter regulation impact the valuation and investment strategies for major AI-focused tech stocks like NVDA and META in the coming quarters?
Could the internal disagreement between Treasury Secretary Bessent and pro-innovation advisers lead to a fragmented regulatory framework where financial sector AI oversight differs from general tech policy?
What specific legislative or executive actions might emerge if the 'red flashing light' concerns regarding models like Anthropic's Mythos gain traction among national security hawks?

























