Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) voiced support on Sunday for a reported ceasefire agreement between the U.S. and Iran, emphasizing its potential to ease energy prices and prevent further military escalation. The deal, which President Donald Trump stated is now complete, aims to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping route that has been effectively closed for months during the conflict. Khanna urged bipartisan backing for the framework, arguing it stabilizes markets and respects the sovereignty of both nations.

In a post on X, Khanna wrote, "The ceasefire agreement with Iran with the opening of the Strait of Hormuz is welcome news. Democrats should support it." He argued that the inclusion of provisions for mutual respect helps avoid "a dumb war of choice again." The Congressman criticized past U.S. military interventions in the region, noting that the war resulted in American casualties and significant financial expenditure. "The war was a costly lesson for the US," Khanna stated, adding that the U.S. "lost 14 precious service members and wasted billions of dollars."

Khanna drew parallels to previous diplomatic efforts, suggesting the emerging terms resemble those secured under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). "The terms seem no better than what Obama secured under the JCPOA nearly a decade ago," he remarked. He highlighted the economic benefits of the agreement, specifically noting that reopening the Strait of Hormuz could alleviate global supply constraints and lower gas and food prices for American consumers.

President Trump confirmed the deal's completion and indicated that the strategic waterway would reopen soon. The announcement follows negotiations involving Qatari mediators, who reportedly engaged in nearly 14 to 15 hours of discussions in Tehran to finalize the draft memorandum of understanding. While neither Washington nor Tehran has publicly confirmed the specific 14-point draft, the framework reportedly includes a permanent ceasefire, sanctions relief, and renewed commitments regarding Iran’s nuclear activities.

Global leaders welcomed the development, though some cautioned that unresolved questions remain. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the agreement as a "hugely important step forward in ending the war," while insisting the Strait of Hormuz must remain "fully and permanently open." Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi called it a "major step toward resolution," and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese expressed hope for a "durable and lasting peace" that would ease pressure on energy prices. French President Emmanuel Macron stated the pact "paves the way for comprehensive negotiations in service of peace and security for all in the Middle East."

Reactions from U.S. lawmakers were mixed. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said he was "pleased" with the memorandum of understanding but expressed concern that Tehran’s interpretation might differ from Washington's. "Time will tell," Graham wrote, adding he would monitor the final agreement closely. Negotiations on a final pact are expected to continue in the coming weeks, with VP Vance scheduled to meet Iran's Qalibaf in Geneva on Friday to sign the agreement.

Iran has formally declared that the United States and Israel bear full responsibility for all consequences arising from the ongoing regional escalation. The statement represents a significant diplomatic signal from Tehran, underscoring the heightened state of geopolitical tensions in the region.

Iran's Position on Regional Escalation

The declaration places direct accountability on both Washington and Tel Aviv for the trajectory of regional developments. By holding two major actors responsible, Iran is articulating a clear and unambiguous stance regarding the causes and potential outcomes of the current escalatory environment.

Regional Implications

The statement carries broad implications for diplomatic and security dynamics across the region. Such formal attributions of responsibility are typically issued at critical junctures and reflect the gravity with which Tehran views the prevailing situation. The declaration signals Iran's intent to document its position as tensions continue to evolve.