US pauses Iran strikes again as blockade tightens; Brent crude near $97
The US has paused its 13-day strike campaign against Iran for a second night, opting for diplomacy while maintaining a strict naval blockade. US forces diverted 12 vessels, including the M/T Lavine and M/T Charminar, disrupting Iranian maritime trade. Brent crude surged 27% to $96.78/barrel, with analysts warning that the Strait of Hormuz could remain closed until 2027, posing significant long-term risks to global energy supplies and market stability.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The United States paused its military strikes against Iran for a second consecutive night on Saturday, maintaining a naval blockade that has significantly disrupted global energy flows. This suspension follows a 13-day campaign of offensive actions, with President Donald Trump reiterating a preference for diplomacy while retaining all options if Iran continues terrorist activities in the Strait of Hormuz or against allies. The strategic pause comes as Brent crude closed at $96.78 a barrel on Friday, climbing approximately 27% over the past two weeks due to escalating US-Iran clashes.
Blockade Enforcement and Maritime Disruptions
Despite the pause in airstrikes, US naval forces have intensified enforcement of the blockade against Iranian ports. Central Command (CENTCOM) reported that as of July 25, US forces had diverted 12 commercial vessels attempting to breach the blockade. Two vessels were halted for failing to comply with orders, and two others were boarded to ensure full compliance. Notably, US forces completed a boarding operation of the M/T Charminar tanker, flying the flag of the Comoros, in the Arabian Sea. On Friday, CENTCOM halted the M/T Lavine tanker, flying the flag of Mozambique, in the Gulf of Oman after its crew ignored repeated warnings and attempted to violate the blockade multiple times.
| Vessel | Flag | Action Taken | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| M/T Charminar | Comoros | Boarded for verification | Arabian Sea |
| M/T Lavine | Mozambique | Movement halted | Gulf of Oman |
Diplomatic Efforts and Regional Tensions
Diplomatic channels remain active amid the military standoff. Omani officials traveled to Tehran this weekend to discuss navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, following the collapse of a mid-June ceasefire after Iranian attacks on commercial vessels. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei stated that talks with Omani deputy foreign ministers were constructive, though no change in traffic status has been confirmed. Meanwhile, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) warned that the UK or any country supporting the US would become legitimate military targets, following reports of planned US-UK meetings in London to form an international coalition for maritime protection.
Iran has also ceased retaliatory attacks since the US halted strikes, according to Army spokesman Mohammad Akraminia. Analysts suggest the pause aims to give ceasefire negotiations more time, though doubts remain about whether escalation alone will compel Tehran to end hostilities.
Market Outlook and Supply Risks
The prolonged conflict poses severe risks to global oil supply chains. Kpler, a global commodities analytics firm, now expects the Strait of Hormuz to remain closed until 2027, a disruption longer than markets initially priced. Matt Smith, Kpler’s research commodity director, noted that five months of conflict have left "no endgame in sight," which could keep crude prices elevated well into next year. With the strait being the world’s most critical oil chokepoint, any physical damage to infrastructure or continued closure threatens immediate volatility in energy markets.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between the pause in kinetic strikes and the tightening of the naval blockade highlights a shift toward sustained economic pressure rather than immediate military resolution. The 27% surge in Brent crude over two weeks reflects market anxiety over supply continuity, while Kpler’s projection of a closure lasting until 2027 signals long-term structural risks to global energy security. This environment underscores the sensitivity of diplomatic negotiations, where any misstep could exacerbate regional volatility and further strain relations with key Gulf allies.
How might the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz until 2027 accelerate the global transition to alternative energy sources or reroute major oil supply chains?
What specific economic sanctions or trade barriers could the US and UK coalition impose on nations attempting to bypass the naval blockade, and how would this impact global shipping insurance costs?
Could the current diplomatic engagement with Oman serve as a viable model for a broader regional ceasefire, or are structural disagreements between the US and Iran too deep to resolve through third-party mediation?

























