Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on Countries Trading with Iran Amid Ongoing Protests

3 min read     Updated on 13 Jan 2026, 05:24 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
Overview

President Trump announced immediate 25% tariffs on countries trading with Iran amid widespread protests that have killed over 500 people and led to more than 10,000 arrests. The policy affects major economies including India, Turkey, and China, potentially disrupting global trade relationships. Iranian officials have reached out seeking talks while Trump considers military options, with the US Supreme Court set to rule on tariff legality Wednesday.

29807643

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

President Donald Trump announced immediate 25% tariffs on goods from countries conducting business with Iran, significantly escalating pressure on Tehran amid widespread protests that have challenged the Islamic Republic's ruling system. The sweeping tariff policy has the potential to disrupt major US trading relationships across the globe, affecting large economies including India, Turkey, and China.

Tariff Policy Details

Trump posted on social media Monday that the new duty would be "effective immediately," though he provided limited details about the scope or implementation. The comprehensive nature of the policy is evident in his statement: "Any Country doing business with the Islamic Republic of Iran will pay a Tariff of 25% on any and all business being done with the United States of America. This Order is final and conclusive."

Policy Aspect: Details
Tariff Rate: 25%
Effective Date: Immediate
Scope: All countries trading with Iran
Implementation: Details not specified

Impact on Major Trading Partners

The tariff announcement affects several significant economies currently engaged in trade with Iran. The US president has already imposed levies as high as 50% on Indian goods tied to their purchase of Russian oil, with both sides working for months to finalize a deal providing tariff relief to New Delhi. An additional 25% tariff on Chinese products risks disrupting the trade truce Trump negotiated with Chinese President Xi Jinping late last year. China serves as the world's top buyer of Iranian crude, with independent refiners increasing their intake of Iranian oil as of last month.

Iranian Protests and Government Response

Iran has experienced weeks of mass unrest initially sparked by a currency crisis and worsening economic conditions, but demonstrations have increasingly targeted the regime itself. The protests represent the biggest challenge to the Islamic Republic's ruling system since 1979, spreading across the country and drawing hundreds of thousands of people over the weekend according to some accounts.

Protest Impact: Numbers
Deaths Reported: Over 500 people
Arrests Made: More than 10,000
Source: Human Rights Activists News Agency

US Response and Diplomatic Developments

Trump has openly backed the protesters and warned Tehran against violently repressing demonstrations. In a Fox News interview last week, he stated the US would hit Iran "very hard" if it continued shooting at protesters. On Sunday, Trump told reporters that Iranian leadership has reached out seeking talks and that a meeting is being arranged, though he offered no timing details.

The president indicated his administration is considering various options while coordinating with allies. "We're looking at it very seriously. The military is looking at it, and we're looking at some very strong options," Trump told reporters. "I'm getting an hourly report and we're going to make a determination." A White House official confirmed Trump has been briefed on military strike options in Iran, including nonmilitary sites, with the president seriously considering authorizing an attack.

Legal and Regional Implications

The tariff threat faces potential legal challenges, with the US Supreme Court preparing to rule on the legality of Trump's global tariffs. The court's next opinion day is Wednesday, and an adverse ruling could hamper Trump's ability to quickly impose duties on Iran's partners. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has opened communication channels with Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, according to a ministry spokesman.

The escalating tensions have put the region on edge, particularly given concerns about potential intervention that could draw neighboring countries into the crisis and risk access to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for energy exporters. Iran has warned the US and Israel against any intervention attempts, while Tehran and Washington have maintained no formal diplomatic ties for decades.

like15
dislike

Trump Attributes 30% Power Cost Rise to Biden Policies, Calls for Tech Giants to Self-Fund Energy Needs

1 min read     Updated on 13 Jan 2026, 05:20 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
Overview

Trump has blamed Biden-era policies for causing power costs to rise by over 30%, according to a Truth Social statement. He called for technology giants to fund their own energy infrastructure rather than relying on existing systems. Trump framed this demand as necessary for consumer protection and national security, arguing that tech companies should not burden general consumers with their substantial energy requirements.

29807404

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Trump has attributed a significant increase in power costs to policies implemented during the Biden administration, claiming costs have risen by over 30%. The statement was made via Truth Social, Trump's social media platform.

Energy Cost Concerns

According to Trump's statement, power costs have experienced substantial increases under Biden-era policies. The following details were highlighted:

Issue: Details
Cost Increase: Over 30% rise in power costs
Attribution: Biden-era policies
Platform: Truth Social announcement

Technology Sector Responsibility

Trump has called for major technology companies to take responsibility for their energy consumption by funding their own energy infrastructure. This demand stems from concerns about the impact of tech giants' substantial energy requirements on existing power systems.

The statement emphasizes that technology companies should not rely on existing energy infrastructure that serves general consumers. Instead, these companies should develop and fund their own energy solutions to meet their operational demands.

Consumer and Security Implications

The statement frames this issue as both a consumer protection and national security matter. Trump argues that requiring tech giants to fund their own energy needs would:

  • Protect consumers from bearing the cost burden of corporate energy demands
  • Address national security concerns related to energy infrastructure
  • Reduce strain on existing power systems serving residential and smaller commercial users

Policy Debate Context

This statement adds to ongoing political discourse regarding energy policy and corporate responsibility in the technology sector. The criticism of Biden-era policies reflects broader partisan disagreements over energy regulation and infrastructure development approaches.

like15
dislike
Explore Other Articles