Iran media urges Tehran to charge tech giants for Hormuz cable fees
- Tasnim News Agency argues Iran should charge Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon for subsea cable usage in the Strait of Hormuz
- The proposal targets FALCON and Gulf Bridge International cables passing through Iranian territorial waters within 12 nautical miles
- Google owns or has majority stakes in 34 global cable systems, while Meta is involved in 20, per TeleGeography data
- Mohsen Rezaei warned that renewed conflict could threaten regional data centers and AI facilities, citing inadequate U.S. responses
- Alphabet stock saw minor gains, with Class A shares closing up 0.30% at $352.72 despite the geopolitical rhetoric

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
An Iranian news agency argued that Tehran should require Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG), Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ: META), Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT), and Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) to obtain permits and pay ongoing fees for subsea internet cables crossing Iranian waters in the Strait of Hormuz.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-affiliated Tasnim News Agency published an analysis on Monday stating that Iran should apply its domestic laws to the FALCON and Gulf Bridge International cable systems. The report claimed these systems pass through Iranian territorial waters and described the four companies as owning a large portion of the cables’ capacity. It asserted that these entities should obtain passage permits and pay operating licenses and fees.
Legal basis and cable ownership
Tasnim argued that the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea grants coastal states absolute sovereignty over the seabed within 12 nautical miles. The agency stated that treaty protections for cables do not apply in this zone, leaving room for Iran to charge for safety, environmental, and governance services.
According to TeleGeography data cited in the report, Google has direct ownership or majority stakes in 34 cable systems worldwide, while Meta holds stakes in 20. The report did not mention whether any of the companies have been contacted regarding this proposal.
Regional tensions and infrastructure threats
The proposal follows warnings from Mohsen Rezaei, head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council. Over the weekend, Rezaei warned that renewed fighting with the U.S. could threaten "cables, data centers, AI facilities and other sites in the region," according to PBS, citing state-run IRNA.
In a post on X on Sunday, Rezaei stated that the U.S. had agreed to some of Iran’s seven conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz. However, he noted that Tehran considers Washington’s response "inadequate" and declared there will be "no return to the status quo ante."
Market reaction
On Monday, Alphabet’s Class A stock closed 0.30% higher at $352.72 and gained 0.18% to $353.35 in after-hours trading. Its Class C shares closed 0.32% higher at $348.97 and rose 0.18% to $349.61 in extended trading. Benzinga Edge rankings indicate Google’s Class A stock has a Momentum score in the 83rd percentile and a Growth score in the 88th percentile.
Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta, as well as the Iranian government and the U.S. Department of War, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
How might the proposed permit requirements impact the operational costs and latency for hyperscale cloud providers operating in the Middle East?
What legal precedents exist regarding coastal state sovereignty over subsea cables within 12 nautical miles, and how might they influence international arbitration?
Could this proposal trigger retaliatory regulatory measures against Iranian digital infrastructure or state-linked entities by U.S. tech giants?

























