Cruz says China spends to scare Americans away from AI

1 min read     Updated on 23 Jun 2026, 02:20 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Senator Ted Cruz alleges that Chinese Communist Party-linked actors are funding efforts to amplify American fears about artificial intelligence to slow U.S. technological progress. He cited polls showing existing concerns and argued that the goal is to increase public opposition to AI development. These comments follow reports that China has invested less aggressively in AI than the U.S. and recent moves by the Commerce Department to tighten export controls on advanced AI chips.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43750210

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Senator Ted Cruz stated on Sunday that Chinese Communist Party-linked actors are funding efforts to amplify American fears about artificial intelligence (AI), arguing the objective is to slow U.S. technological progress. In a post on X, Cruz wrote that "Chinese communists have spent a lot of money trying to scare Americans away from AI." He suggested that while concerns about AI are rational, there is a concerted effort by outside actors to deepen those fears to drive public opposition against the technology.

Cruz cited polls indicating that roughly 60% to 70% of Americans already express worries about AI. He argued that the Chinese Communist Party aims to increase this figure to 80% or 90% to generate enough public pressure to shut down AI development in the United States. The Senator's comments were part of a podcast shared on his social media channel.

US-China AI Rivalry

The allegations come amid broader discussions regarding the competitive landscape between the U.S. and China in the AI sector. Chris Miller, author of "Chip War," recently noted that China has invested less aggressively in AI than the U.S., suggesting Beijing does not view Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) with the same urgency as American companies and policymakers. Miller pointed out that China’s $295 billion AI plan is spread over five years and that Chinese firms have favored chips from Huawei over products from Nvidia Corp.

Policy and Trade Actions

Separately, the U.S. government has taken steps to tighten controls on advanced technology. The U.S. Commerce Department recently closed a loophole that allowed overseas subsidiaries of Chinese companies to obtain advanced AI chips, impacting exports from companies like Nvidia. Additionally, reports from last month indicated that Washington and Beijing were considering official AI talks ahead of a potential meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, with discussions expected to focus on AI safety risks and advanced weapons systems.

How might the U.S. government balance the need to address legitimate AI safety concerns with the risk of stifling innovation due to foreign influence campaigns?

What specific legislative measures could Congress introduce to counter foreign-funded disinformation efforts targeting U.S. technological development?

How will the recent tightening of AI chip export controls impact the global supply chain and Nvidia's market position?

like18
dislike

China adds 10 US firms, including rare-earth miner, to export control list

1 min read     Updated on 22 Jun 2026, 10:38 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
AI Summary

China's Ministry of Commerce imposed export controls on ten U.S. firms, including MP Materials Corp and Teal Drones, prohibiting exports of dual-use items. The Finance Ministry also barred 46 U.S. defense contractors from government procurement. These measures respond to U.S. actions against Chinese firms, though analysts view the impact as largely symbolic given the limited business presence of the targeted companies in China.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43659111

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Beijing imposed export controls on ten U.S. industrial suppliers on Monday, including rare earth miners and drone manufacturers, escalating the ongoing trade tensions between the two nations. China’s Ministry of Commerce has targeted ten American industrial suppliers, including MP Materials Corp and USA Rare Earth Inc, along with drone manufacturers Teal Drones and Jaia Robotics. The list also includes California-based electronics manufacturer Aveox Inc, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp, and military equipment supplier Oshkosh Defense. The new regulations prohibit exports of any dual-use items originating in China to these companies.

The Ministry stated that these measures are a response to the “U.S. government’s malicious practice” and are intended to protect national security and interests, as well as to fulfill international obligations such as non-proliferation. In a separate statement on Monday, China’s Finance Ministry said it has barred 46 U.S. companies—primarily defense contractors—from participating in Chinese government procurement projects. However, foreign-funded companies registered locally in China and their affiliates are exempt from the restriction.

U.S.-China Trade Tensions Escalate

This move by China comes in the wake of increased scrutiny of Chinese tech giants by the U.S. Earlier this month, the Pentagon expanded its blacklist of companies, including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, Baidu Inc., and BYD Co.Ltd., suspected of having ties to China’s military or defense-industrial sector. This blacklist prevents the Department from contracting directly with these companies and procuring their products or services through third parties.

At the same time, the Trump administration has reportedly postponed adding Chinese AI firm DeepSeek, memory chipmaker ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), and more than 100 other Chinese companies to the U.S. Commerce Department’s Entity List, despite approval by an interagency committee last year. According to Reuters, the delay has left the companies off a blacklist that would significantly restrict their access to U.S. goods, software, and technology. The U.S. has not announced new Entity List additions since October, the longest pause in updates in over a decade.

Han Shen Lin, China country director at the consultancy The Asia Group, told CNBC that Beijing’s response appears largely symbolic rather than a major escalation in U.S.-China tensions, since most of the targeted companies have little to no significant business presence in China.

How might the U.S. respond to these export controls, particularly regarding rare earth dependencies?

Could these measures signal a shift toward more aggressive targeting of critical supply chains beyond the current list?

What impact will these restrictions have on the global drone and defense manufacturing industries?

like17
dislike