CLARITY Act stalls as Senate prioritizes Russia sanctions bill
The U.S. Senate shelved the CLARITY Act, prioritizing a Russia sanctions bill and federal nominations before the August 8 recess. This delay reduces the likelihood of crypto regulatory clarity, with prediction markets dropping the odds of passage to 35%. The absence of Sen. Mitch McConnell further complicates the vote count, requiring more Democratic crossovers despite endorsements from BlackRock and Goldman Sachs.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The U.S. Senate has shelved the CLARITY Act, effectively removing the primary legislative catalyst for the cryptocurrency sector as lawmakers prioritize federal nominations and a Russia sanctions bill dedicated to the late Senator Lindsey Graham. This delay coincides with a sharp decline in market confidence, with Polymarket prediction contracts pricing the bill’s enactment in 2026 at just 35%, down from 82% in February. The setback prolongs regulatory uncertainty for digital assets, particularly as major financial institutions including BlackRock, Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs, and SoFi recently endorsed the legislation.
The legislative pivot stems from Senate Majority Leader John Thune’s decision to allocate the chamber’s final pre-recess days to other matters before the August 8 break. The Russia sanctions bill honors Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), whose funeral occupied the chamber Tuesday and Wednesday. President Donald Trump had urged senators to pass the crypto bill “in honor of” Graham, describing him as “a big supporter,” despite Graham not sitting on either committee that drafted the legislation. The delay means the CLARITY Act is unlikely to see floor time before next week, marking the end of the immediate window for passage this session.
Political Hurdles and Absences
The CLARITY Act requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. With Republicans holding 53 seats following the appointment of Darline Graham Nordone to Graham’s seat, at least seven Democrats must cross party lines to support the measure. However, the absence of Sen. Mitch McConnell complicates the math. McConnell has been absent since a fall on June 14, and Capitol physicians stated on Monday that the 84-year-old is not yet cleared to leave his rehabilitation facility.
Prediction markets reflect this uncertainty: Polymarket traders assign McConnell less than a 1% chance of voting by July 31 and a 31% chance he will resign before his term ends. Because cloture counts all 100 seats, an absence functions as a no vote, potentially raising the required Democratic crossovers to eight. Democrats continue to push for stricter rules barring officials, including Trump, from profiting off digital assets.
Institutional Support vs. Internal Conflict
The delay arrives just as Wall Street giants publicly endorsed the bill. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon stated the Act “is not perfect” but expressed strong support for moving it forward. The legislation aims to shift oversight of most tokens from the SEC to the lighter-touch Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), lifting the legal cloud over exchanges like Coinbase Global (NASDAQ: COIN).
However, not all institutions align. JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) reportedly clashed with Coinbase over stablecoin yield provisions. Coinbase stands to gain significantly from passage, while JPMorgan’s opposition highlights internal industry divisions on regulatory structure.
| Metric | Value / Status |
|---|---|
| Polymarket Odds (Passage) | 35% (down from 82%) |
| Required Votes | 60 |
| Republican Seats | 53 |
| McConnell Voting Chance | <1% by July 31 |
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between institutional endorsement and legislative reality underscores the fragility of crypto regulatory progress. While BlackRock and Goldman Sachs advocate for clarity, the political cost of passing the bill—requiring multiple Democratic crossovers amidst McConnell’s absence—remains prohibitive. The drop in prediction market odds from 82% to 35% signals that traders view the August recess as a likely endpoint for this legislative cycle, increasing volatility risk for assets like XRP and Bitcoin ahead of the Federal Reserve’s Wednesday decision.
How might the prolonged regulatory uncertainty impact the Federal Reserve's upcoming decision on interest rates, given the increased volatility risk for digital assets?
Will the absence of Sen. Mitch McConnell and the resulting vote math force Democrats to demand stricter anti-profiteering clauses as a condition for crossing party lines?
Could the internal conflict between JPMorgan and Coinbase over stablecoin yields lead to a fragmented industry approach to lobbying, potentially weakening the unified institutional support for the CLARITY Act?

































