Schwab research chief sets Bitcoin fair value at $95,000 on supply constraints

2 min read     Updated on 30 Jul 2026, 12:21 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
ScanX News Team
AI Summary

Jim Feroli, Head of Crypto Research at Charles Schwab, estimates Bitcoin's fair value at $95,000, driven by miner production costs and supply constraints. He views the CLARITY Act as a largely unpriced catalyst, noting it explains only 4% of price movements despite its potential to revive institutional adoption. While Fed policy poses short-term risks, Feroli sees significant upside if regulatory clarity emerges before the August recess.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
46896683

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Charles Schwab Head of Crypto Research Jim Feroli has estimated Bitcoin's fair value at $95,000, citing the production costs of the least-efficient miners as a key valuation anchor. Speaking with CoinDesk on Tuesday, Feroli noted that while the asset typically faces seasonal weakness during the summer, it could benefit from a year-end rally as risk appetite improves. The stakes for investors are high, as Feroli suggests that relatively modest inflows could drive significant price gains given Bitcoin's supply-constrained nature, particularly if regulatory clarity improves and institutional adoption accelerates.

Feroli based his $95,000 valuation on the marginal cost of production, contrasting it with efficient miners who currently produce Bitcoin at a rough price of $60,000. He emphasized that the asset scaled quickly from $60,000 to $83,000 earlier this year, demonstrating its sensitivity to flow dynamics. "It does not take a lot of flow to move the needle on Bitcoin," Feroli said, though he remained uncertain about the timeline, predicting prices could reach fair value in six months or potentially sooner.

Regulatory Catalysts and Monetary Policy

Beyond supply-side dynamics, Feroli identified the CLARITY Act as crypto's biggest fundamental catalyst. Contrary to market expectations that legislation may already be reflected in prices, Schwab's research suggests the bill remains largely unpriced. The firm's analysis found that changes in the probability of the legislation passing explain only about 4% of Bitcoin's daily price movements. If Congress approves the bill before the August recess, Feroli believes it could revive the institutional adoption narrative that helped lift Bitcoin roughly 25% following several high-profile ETF launches earlier this year.

"If it were to pass in the next couple weeks, we think that is really serving as a legislative call option," Feroli stated. This potential legislative boost stands in contrast to near-term monetary policy risks. Markets remain focused on this week's Federal Reserve meeting, with investors assessing the risk of additional monetary tightening. While a rate hike would likely pressure crypto prices in the short term, Feroli expects policymakers to maintain a hawkish tone regardless of the decision.

What the Numbers Show

The divergence between efficient and inefficient miner costs provides a clear valuation floor and ceiling. Efficient miners operating at $60,000 suggest strong profitability at current levels, while the $95,000 fair value represents the breakeven point for less efficient producers. This spread implies significant upside potential if demand increases, even modestly.

Metric Value Context
Fair Value Estimate $95,000 Based on least-efficient miner costs
Efficient Miner Cost $60,000 Current production cost for efficient miners
CLARITY Act Impact 4% Explains share of daily price movements
Post-ETF Rally 25% Lift following high-profile ETF launches

The limited pricing of the CLARITY Act (4%) relative to the potential upside ($95,000 target) suggests that regulatory clarity remains an underappreciated driver. Feroli's view that the bill acts as a "legislative call option" highlights the asymmetric risk-reward profile for investors ahead of the August recess.

How might the Federal Reserve's decision on monetary tightening this week specifically impact Bitcoin's short-term trajectory given Feroli's expectation of a hawkish tone?

If the CLARITY Act fails to pass before the August recess, what alternative legislative or regulatory catalysts could drive institutional adoption in the second half of the year?

Could a surge in mining difficulty following a price rally toward $95,000 force inefficient miners out of the market sooner than expected, thereby altering the supply-constrained dynamic?

like15
dislike

Pompliano says Bitcoin reaches all-time highs without CLARITY Act

2 min read     Updated on 29 Jul 2026, 09:19 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
ScanX News Team
AI Summary

Anthony Pompliano claims Bitcoin will hit all-time highs regardless of the CLARITY Act's fate, emphasizing its existing regulatory status as a non-security. While Wall Street giants like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs support the bill for stability, JPMorgan pushes for stricter yield rules. The Senate delays action until after the August 8 recess.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
46885722

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Anthony Pompliano asserts that Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) does not require the passage of the CLARITY Act to reach new all-time highs, arguing that the asset’s trajectory is driven by fundamentals rather than legislative clarity. Speaking on his podcast on Tuesday, Pompliano stated that even if the bill fails, Bitcoin will still achieve record prices because it is already widely held by hundreds of millions globally and is not classified as a security. The stakes for investors lie in understanding that regulatory debates are shifting focus from asset classification to control over stablecoin yields.

Pompliano acknowledged that passing the CLARITY Act would accelerate timelines by generating enthusiasm among Wall Street and politicians, but he maintained that Bitcoin’s value proposition remains intact regardless. He argued that the current political struggle is not about whether crypto needs regulation, but about who profits from stablecoins. Both banks and crypto firms present legitimate arguments: banks demand equal rules for bank-like products, while crypto firms accuse banks of protecting their deposit business after years of exclusion.

Wall Street Endorsements vs. Crypto Skepticism

Despite Pompliano’s stance, major financial institutions are publicly backing the CLARITY Act. BlackRock (NYSE: BLK), Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), and SoFi (NASDAQ: SOFI) have urged Congress to pass the bill. BlackRock’s Samara Cohen called it an important step toward a regulatory framework that puts investors first. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon noted the bill is imperfect but creates a level playing field for market stability.

Institution Stance on CLARITY Act Key Statement
BlackRock Supports "Important step toward establishing a regulatory framework"
Goldman Sachs Supports Creates "a level playing field to enhance market stability"
JPMorgan Opposes/Modifies Pushes for tighter stablecoin yield restrictions
SoFi Supports Urged Congress to pass the bill
Fidelity Supports Urged Congress to pass the bill

JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM) remains a notable holdout, advocating for tighter restrictions on stablecoin yields that crypto firms argue would weaken the legislation. Pompliano warned that if the bill fails, companies like Coinbase (NASDAQ: COIN) will build offshore, allowing US consumers to access products through international or unregulated channels. He criticized the delay as an "insider game" that suffers consumers.

What the Numbers Show

The divergence between institutional support and crypto-native skepticism highlights a structural split in how different market participants view regulatory risk. While traditional finance firms like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs see the CLARITY Act as essential for market stability and investor protection, figures like Pompliano view it as secondary to Bitcoin’s organic adoption. This suggests that Bitcoin’s price action may remain decoupled from immediate legislative outcomes, relying instead on global holding patterns and decentralized utility rather than US regulatory approval.

The Senate is not expected to take up the bill immediately. Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) is prioritizing nominations and a Russia sanctions package ahead of the August 8 recess deadline, delaying any potential vote on the CLARITY Act.

How might the potential offshore expansion of US crypto firms like Coinbase impact domestic regulatory leverage and consumer protection standards?

What specific market signals could indicate that Bitcoin's price trajectory is indeed decoupling from US legislative outcomes as Pompliano suggests?

If JPMorgan's push for tighter stablecoin yield restrictions succeeds, how would that alter the competitive landscape between traditional banks and crypto-native issuers?

like20
dislike

More News on Bitcoin