Saylor says Bitcoin BIP-110 upgrade is more dangerous than the condition
Strategy Inc. founder Michael Saylor opposes the BIP-110 Bitcoin upgrade, stating the risks outweigh the benefits. The proposal seeks to restrict non-monetary data via a soft fork in August 2026. Saylor argues the protocol should remain conservative and reject changes targeting contested externalities.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Strategy Inc. founder Michael Saylor has criticized the proposed BIP-110 software upgrade for Bitcoin, arguing that the "proposed cure is more dangerous than the condition." The upgrade aims to temporarily restrict the use of Bitcoin for storing large amounts of non-monetary data, including Ordinal inscriptions, to refocus the network on improving its function as money. Saylor expressed his apprehensions in an X essay titled "110 Reasons BIP 110 Is a Bad Idea," countering supporters who believe the data "spam" bloats the blockchain and burdens node operators.
Details of the Proposal
BIP-110 proposes a temporary soft fork that introduces seven specific restrictions on transactions containing large amounts of arbitrary data. The proposal is scheduled to head toward a key activation window in early August 2026. Proponents argue that the restrictions are necessary to alleviate significant unnecessary burdens on node operators caused by the storage of non-monetary data.
Saylor's Arguments
Saylor argued that a soft fork capable of rendering blocks invalid should be reserved only for clear, severe, and broadly understood failures. He contended that BIP-110 does not rectify known critical bugs or consensus failures such as inflation, signature validation, or double-spending. Instead, it addresses a "contested externality and use case," for which Saylor believes the burden of proof must be exceptionally high. He emphasized that Bitcoin's strength lies in neutral rules and hard consensus rather than agreement on every use case.
Industry Reaction
Saylor's critique faced resistance from veteran Bitcoin trader Fred Krueger, who published a counter-essay defending the upgrade as a "good idea." Conversely, Casa co-founder and Bitcoin security expert Jameson Lopp stated that it is acceptable to "stop respecting BIP-110 supporters" due to what he perceives as poor judgment regarding protocol changes. At the time of writing, BTC was trading at $64,785.18, up 0.26% over the last 24 hours.
How might the activation window in August 2026 impact Bitcoin's price volatility leading up to the deadline?
Could the debate over BIP-110 lead to a permanent split in the Bitcoin community regarding protocol governance?
What alternative solutions might node operators propose if BIP-110 fails to gain sufficient support?

































