Bitcoin slips below $65,000 as traders position for FOMC
Bitcoin trades below $65,000 as markets brace for the FOMC decision. Significant trader liquidations reached $437.94 million, while spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $240.08 million in outflows. Analysts point to support levels near $60,000 amid broader crypto weakness.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Bitcoin slipped below $65,000 on Monday as traders positioned their portfolios ahead of the Federal Reserve's policy decision scheduled for Wednesday. The pullback across major cryptocurrencies reflects heightened caution among investors awaiting clarity on interest rate policy, with significant capital flows indicating a defensive stance in the digital asset market.
Market Movements and Liquidations
The broad correction affected leading digital assets, with Bitcoin trading at $64,729.37. Ethereum declined to $1,930.74, while Solana dropped to $75.33. Other major tokens also faced downward pressure: XRP traded at $1.08, Dogecoin at $0.07159, and Shiba Inu at $0.000005033.
| Cryptocurrency | Ticker | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin | BTC | $64,729.37 |
| Ethereum | ETH | $1,930.74 |
| Solana | SOL | $75.33 |
| XRP | XRP | $1.08 |
| Dogecoin | DOGE | $0.07159 |
| Shiba Inu | SHIB | $0.000005033 |
Volatility intensified over the weekend, resulting in substantial trader losses. According to Coinglass data, 118,449 traders were liquidated in the past 24 hours, totaling $437.94 million. This wave of forced exits underscores the sensitivity of leveraged positions to pre-FOMC uncertainty.
Institutional Flows and Analyst Views
Institutional sentiment appeared cautious, with SoSoValue data showing net outflows of $240.08 million from spot Bitcoin ETFs on Wednesday. Spot Ethereum ETFs also saw net outflows of $70.6 million during the same period. Despite the broader downturn, specific altcoins such as Pump.fun, LayerZero, and Aerodrome Finance emerged as top gainers in the past 24 hours.
Technical analyst Lennaert Snyder noted that Bitcoin's weekend rally is retracing as expected after rejecting the $65,800 level. He identified liquidity above those highs as a likely future upside target. Snyder highlighted three potential long-entry zones, starting around $63,500. He maintained that the preferred accumulation area remains around $60,000, with $59,000 viewed as the extreme range low offering the best risk-reward if buyers step in. Snyder cautioned traders to account for potential volatility ahead of this week's FOMC meeting.
Trader KillaXBT argued that current calls for a drop to $50,000–$40,000 mirror the 2022 market dynamics, where many investors waited for prices to fall to $10,000–$12,000 after Bitcoin had already bottomed near $16,000. He contended that buying at $16,000, $20,000, or even $25,000 all proved profitable, rewarding those willing to enter early. Applying this logic to the current cycle, he remains confident that Bitcoin will exceed $160,000, asserting that long-term gains will outweigh the timing of entry.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between massive retail liquidations ($437.94 million) and institutional outflows ($240.08 million from spot Bitcoin ETFs) suggests a synchronized risk-off event driven by macroeconomic anticipation rather than asset-specific fundamentals. While technical analysts identify support levels near $60,000–$63,500, the heavy liquidation volume indicates that leveraged long positions were disproportionately exposed to the pre-FOMC volatility, potentially creating a temporary oversold condition if buying interest returns at these identified zones.
How might the Federal Reserve's Wednesday policy decision specifically alter the trajectory of institutional capital flows into spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs?
Given the heavy liquidation of leveraged positions, will the identified support zones near $60,000–$63,500 hold firm, or is a deeper correction toward the $50,000 level likely if macro uncertainty persists?
Could the divergence between retail liquidations and institutional outflows signal a potential market bottom, or does it indicate broader systemic risk-off sentiment across digital assets?

































