Vivid Mercantile revises FY26 annual report to fix typographical error
- Vivid Mercantile revised its FY26 annual report to fix a typo in Notes to Accounts
- The update also included the previously omitted financial ratios page
- Revenue surged 242% to ₹4,691.06 lakh while PAT grew eight-fold to ₹1,078.80 lakh
- The company is near debt-free with non-current borrowings at just ₹7.00 lakh

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Vivid Mercantile submitted a revised annual report for FY26 to the Bombay Stock Exchange on September 9, 2026. The revision was made to rectify a typographical error in the Notes to Accounts and to include the financial ratios page, which had been inadvertently omitted from the earlier submission. The company confirmed that no other changes or amendments were made to the report.
The original filing highlighted a strong financial performance for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026. Revenue from operations surged 242.17% to ₹4,691.06 lakh, up from ₹1,370.99 lakh in FY25. Profit after tax grew nearly eight-fold by 683.44% to ₹1,078.80 lakh, compared to ₹137.70 lakh in the previous year. Earnings per share improved from ₹0.14 to ₹1.08.
Auditor Appointments
The Board approved M/s P H Shah and Co as Statutory Auditor for five consecutive financial years (FY27 to FY31). M/s Madhav Upadhyay and Associates was appointed as Secretarial Auditor for the same period. Both appointments require shareholder ratification at the upcoming AGM.
| Particulars | Statutory Auditor | Secretarial Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Firm Name | M/s P H Shah and Co | M/s Madhav Upadhyay and Associates |
| Term Duration | Five consecutive financial years | Five consecutive financial years |
| Start Date | April 1, 2026 | April 1, 2026 |
| End Date | March 31, 2031 | March 31, 2031 |
| Approval Status | Board approved; AGM approval pending | Board approved; AGM approval pending |
Resignations Noted
The Board noted the resignation of M/s Shah Karia & Associates as Statutory Auditor and M/s Neelam Somani & Associates as Secretarial Auditor. Both firms resigned on account of personal reasons. Intimations were submitted to BSE Limited as per SEBI Listing Regulations.
Financial Performance
Revenue from operations increased by ₹3,320.07 lakh, representing a growth of 242.17%, from ₹1,370.99 lakh in FY25 to ₹4,691.06 lakh in FY26. Profit After Tax rose by ₹941.10 lakh, or 683.44%, from ₹137.70 lakh to ₹1,078.80 lakh. Total comprehensive income increased by 9.90% to ₹1,230.54 lakh, despite a decline in other comprehensive income of 84.55%.
Rights Issue Proposal
The Board approved a Draft Letter of Offer for a proposed Rights Issue of up to 5,01,28,200 Equity Shares of face value ₹1 each, at an issue price of ₹5 per share. The issue is in the ratio of 1 Rights Equity Share for every 2 fully paid-up Equity Shares held by eligible shareholders as on the record date. The proceeds are intended to augment long-term working capital requirements and general corporate purposes.
What the Numbers Show
The substantial revenue growth was driven by core trading activities, with operating revenue constituting approximately 96.44% of total income in FY26, compared to 81.84% in FY25. While other income declined by 43.18% to ₹172.90 lakh, the significant expansion in operational scale more than offset this reduction. The company strengthened its balance sheet, reducing total borrowings substantially to achieve a near debt-free footing, with non-current borrowings standing at just ₹7.00 lakh as of March 31, 2026.
Historical Stock Returns for Vivid Mercantile
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.34% | -4.38% | -6.12% | -26.04% | +0.35% | +115.15% |
How will the proposed rights issue at ₹5 per share impact existing shareholder equity and potential dilution, given the significant surge in EPS to ₹1.08?
What specific strategic initiatives or market expansions is Vivid Mercantile planning to fund with the proceeds from the rights issue for working capital and general corporate purposes?
Can the company sustain its 242% revenue growth trajectory in FY27, or was the FY26 surge driven by one-off trading opportunities that may not recur?


































