Vishnu Chemicals will host a physical meeting for analysts and institutional investors on September 11, 2026. The event includes a plant visit in Vizag.

The company issued the intimation on August 31, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 30(6) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Vibha Shinde, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer, signed the disclosure.

Meeting Details

The session is scheduled as a one-on-one physical interaction. It will take place at the company’s plant in Vizag.

Regulatory Disclosure

Vishnu Chemicals stated that no unpublished price-sensitive information is proposed to be shared during the meeting. The company noted that changes may occur due to exigencies from either party.

Vishnu Chemicals shareholders approved a final dividend of ₹0.30 per equity share for FY26 at the company’s 33rd Annual General Meeting held on August 28, 2026.

The meeting, conducted via video conferencing, saw all six resolutions passed with requisite majority. Shareholders also approved the appointment of M/s M. Anandam & Co as statutory auditors for a five-year term.

Key Resolutions Passed

The board proposed several ordinary and special resolutions during the AGM. All items received overwhelming support from both promoter and public shareholders.

Voting Participation

The company recorded high participation rates among institutional investors. Promoter group holders voted on 100% of their shares across all resolutions. Public institutional shareholders polled votes on approximately 77% of their holdings, while non-institutional public shareholders participated with roughly 7.4% of their shares.

What the Numbers Show

The voting data reveals a distinct divergence in engagement between institutional and retail blocks. While promoters and institutions showed near-unanimous support (99.99% or higher) for routine matters like financial adoption and auditor appointments, the re-appointment of director Mrs. Ch. Manjula faced slightly higher dissent from public institutions, with 3.07% voting against. This suggests active scrutiny on governance-related appointments by larger non-promoter stakeholders, even as the resolution comfortably passed with 99.74% overall support.