Uttam Sugar Mills Q1 Results: Net profit drops 95% YoY to ₹0.85 crore
Uttam Sugar Mills Ltd saw standalone PAT crash 94.67% YoY to ₹0.85 crore in Q1FY27 due to low sugar production and halved EBITDA margins. Revenue fell 2.83% to ₹588.46 crore, while ethanol realisations rose to ₹57.21/litre. The company maintains 74.71% promoter holding.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Uttam Sugar Mills Ltd reported a steep decline in profitability for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (Q1FY27), driven by lower operational volumes and compressing margins. Standalone net profit after tax (PAT) fell 94.67% year-on-year to ₹0.85 crore, compared to ₹15.96 crore in the corresponding quarter of FY26. Consolidated PAT also dropped 91.05% to ₹1.30 crore from ₹14.53 crore. The results reflect the seasonal nature of the sugar business, with minimal cane crushing activity in the first quarter offsetting strong performance in the ethanol and branded sugar divisions.
The company’s total revenue from operations declined 2.83% to ₹588.46 crore on a standalone basis, down from ₹605.57 crore in Q1FY26. Consolidated revenue also decreased to ₹607.65 crore from ₹629.96 crore. EBITDA contracted sharply by 51.11% to ₹25.23 crore (standalone), causing the EBITDA margin to halve to 4.29% from 8.52% in the prior year period. Profit before tax (PBT) plummeted 94.96% to ₹1.07 crore, underscoring the impact of fixed costs on reduced operating leverage.
Operational Performance
Sugar production volumes were minimal during the quarter, recording only 0.60 lakh quintals against 2.90 lakh quintals in Q1FY26. However, sugar sales remained robust at 10.09 lakh quintals, supported by inventory drawdowns. Average sugar realisation improved to ₹4,192 per quintal from ₹4,074 per quintal, indicating stable pricing despite lower fresh production. Inventory levels stood at 9.95 lakh quintals, down from 17.67 lakh quintals in the previous year.
| Metric | Q1FY27 | Q1FY26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar Production (Lakh Qtls) | 0.60 | 2.90 | -79.31% |
| Sugar Sales (Lakh Qtls) | 10.09 | 10.60 | -4.81% |
| Realisation (₹/Qtl) | 4192 | 4074 | +2.89% |
In the ethanol segment, distillery production was 223.95 lakh litres, down from 260.63 lakh litres in Q1FY26. Distillery sales totaled 262.09 lakh litres, with realisation rising to ₹57.21 per litre from ₹55.43 per litre. Power exports were negligible at 5.10 lakh KWH, compared to 97.79 lakh KWH in the prior year, consistent with seasonal power generation patterns.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between declining revenue and sharply higher interest expenses relative to profit highlights the pressure on margins during low-volume quarters. While interest costs decreased slightly to ₹12.40 crore from ₹18.96 crore, they consumed nearly all of the EBITDA, leaving a thin PBT margin of just 0.18%. This suggests that fixed financial obligations remain a significant drag on profitability when operational throughput is low. The growth in branded specialty sales, which have tripled over six years, provides a counterbalance but remains a smaller contributor to overall top-line stability.
Financial Position
Depreciation charges increased marginally to ₹11.76 crore from ₹11.40 crore. Total comprehensive income stood at ₹1.20 crore (standalone). The company maintains a promoter holding of 74.71%, with public holding at 25.29%. Uttam Sugar operates four sugar units with a total crushing capacity of 27,000 TCD and distillery capacity of 350 KLPD, positioning it for recovery as the new crushing season begins.
Historical Stock Returns for Uttam Sugar Mills
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.26% | +5.17% | +8.79% | +12.18% | +3.51% | +33.55% |
How will the upcoming crushing season's cane supply and government policy changes impact Uttam Sugar's recovery trajectory in Q2FY27?
What specific strategies is management implementing to mitigate the drag of high fixed interest costs during low-volume seasonal quarters?
Can the ethanol division sustain its margin expansion given the recent dip in production volumes and potential shifts in government procurement policies?


































