Travel Food Services Limited Faces Legal Setback as Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award
Travel Food Services Limited received an unfavorable Delhi High Court order dated April 6, 2026, setting aside an arbitral award from September 26, 2022, that was previously issued in the company's favor. The court ruled that the unilateral appointment of arbitrator by Airport Authority of India was void ab initio, making the award a nullity. The dispute relates to the company's F&B concession at Goa Airport, where it sought rebate in concession fees and release of deposits. The company's execution application filed in April 2024 has also been disposed as infructuous, and the company is now consulting legal advisors to determine next steps.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Travel Food Services Limited has encountered a significant legal setback after the Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award that was previously issued in the company's favor. The court order dated April 6, 2026, received by the company on April 12, 2026, has overturned the arbitral award dated September 26, 2022, in a dispute involving the Airport Authority of India.
Background of the Dispute
The legal proceedings stem from Travel Food Services' F&B concession operations at Dabolim Airport, Panaji, Goa. The company had initiated arbitration proceedings against Airport Authority of India, Goa Airport in 2018, seeking rebate in concession fees due to non-provision of electricity by AAI. Additionally, the company sought release of security deposits, bank guarantees, and other cash deposits held with AAI.
| Case Details: | Information |
|---|---|
| Original Arbitral Award Date: | September 26, 2022 |
| Court Order Date: | April 6, 2026 |
| Order Received by Company: | April 12, 2026 |
| Arbitration Initiated: | 2018 |
| Execution Application Filed: | April 2024 |
Court's Ruling and Rationale
The Delhi High Court allowed AAI's petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which challenged the original arbitral award. In a significant development, the court ruled that the unilateral appointment of the arbitrator by AAI was 'void ab initio', thereby rendering the arbitral award a 'nullity' in the eyes of law.
The court's decision was based on a recent judgment of the Supreme Court, and notably, the High Court reached this conclusion without examining the merits of the original award. This procedural ruling has effectively invalidated the entire arbitration process that had previously favored Travel Food Services.
Impact on Pending Applications
As a consequence of the High Court's order, the execution application filed by Travel Food Services in April 2024 for implementing the arbitral award has also been disposed of as infructuous. This means the company cannot proceed with enforcing the favorable arbitral award that had rejected AAI's counterclaims pertaining to alleged non-payment of concession fees.
Company's Response and Next Steps
Travel Food Services has stated that it is currently assessing the implications of the court order in consultation with its legal advisors. The company is evaluating appropriate courses of action to safeguard its interests following this legal setback.
The development has been disclosed under Regulation 30 of SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015, as it represents a material change in the status of ongoing litigation involving the company. This disclosure follows the company's earlier mention of the case in its prospectus dated July 10, 2025.
Will Travel Food Services initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with a properly appointed arbitrator to pursue their claims against AAI?
How might this legal setback impact Travel Food Services' financial position and cash flow, given the potential loss of security deposits and bank guarantees?
Could this Delhi High Court ruling set a precedent that affects other ongoing arbitration cases involving Airport Authority of India across different airports?























