Tirupati Sarjan Clarifies Delayed Disclosure of ₹19.89 Crore IT Demand Notices
Tirupati Sarjan Limited has provided comprehensive clarification to BSE regarding delayed disclosure of income tax demand notices totaling ₹19.89 crore across four assessment years. The company attributed the delay to operational oversight during financial year-end activities and emphasized no malafide intention, while confirming plans to appeal the demands through appropriate legal channels.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Tirupati Sarjan Limited has provided detailed clarification to BSE regarding the delayed disclosure of income tax demand notices worth ₹19.89 crore. The company submitted its comprehensive response on April 7, 2026, addressing BSE's discrepancy remark about the material event not being disclosed within the mandatory 24-hour timeline under Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015.
Disclosure Delay Explanation
The company explained that the income tax demand notices received between March 26-30, 2026, were sent to the email address tirupatisarjanltd@gmail.com , which is operated by multiple employees in the Accounts Department. The notices inadvertently escaped the attention of the Accounts Manager, who was occupied with financial year-end closing activities during that period. The company emphasized that weekends and a public holiday (Mahavir Jayanti) occurred during the period, contributing to the delayed response.
| Timeline Details: | Date |
|---|---|
| Notice Receipt Period: | March 26-30, 2026 |
| Matter Discovered: | April 1, 2026 (evening) |
| BSE Filing Date: | April 2, 2026 |
| BSE Discrepancy Remark: | April 6, 2026 |
| Company Response: | April 7, 2026 |
Income Tax Demand Details
The original disclosure revealed four separate demand notices from the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Gandhinagar Circle, under section 156 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The notices were issued by Vinayak Baburao Parate, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Gandhinagar Circle.
| Assessment Year: | Demand Amount (₹): | Notice Date: | Violations Alleged: |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19: | 6,56,19,630 | 30/03/2026 | Unexplained expenditure under section 69C |
| 2017-18: | 5,86,36,170 | 28/03/2026 | Unexplained expenditure under section 69C and Cash Credit under section 68 |
| 2016-17: | 4,69,72,846 | 29/03/2026 | Unexplained expenditure under section 69C and Cash Credit under section 68 |
| 2020-21: | 1,00,47,730 | 26/03/2026 | Cash Credit under section 68 |
Company's Position and Next Steps
Tirupati Sarjan Limited emphasized that the delay was without any malafide or wilful intention on the part of the company or its directors. Managing Director Jitendrakumar Ishvarlal Patel (DIN: 00262902) signed the clarification response, reiterating the company's commitment to regulatory compliance. Based on the merits of each matter, the company is in the process of preferring appeals before the Appellate Authority or exploring other legal options against the demand notices.
Regulatory Compliance Framework
The disclosure was made under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, in compliance with SEBI Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/CFD-PoD-1/P/CIR/2023/123 dated July 13, 2023. The company has provided detailed annexures containing complete information about each demand notice as required under the amended regulations. According to the notices, the company has 30 days from service to pay the demanded amounts or file appeals with CIT (A), Gandhinagar within thirty days of receipt.
Historical Stock Returns for Tirupati Sarjan
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.20% | +4.16% | +18.57% | -30.90% | -38.23% | +71.16% |
How might the ₹19.89 crore tax demand impact Tirupati Sarjan's cash flow and ability to fund ongoing operations or expansion plans?
What are the potential outcomes if the company's appeals to the Appellate Authority are unsuccessful, and how would this affect shareholder value?
Could this delayed disclosure trigger additional regulatory scrutiny from SEBI regarding the company's internal compliance processes?






























