Tesla CEO Elon Musk promises flying cars, shares rise

scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
Key Highlights

Elon Musk promised flying cars, reviving interest in Tesla's delayed Roadster. The CEO's comments follow hints about SpaceX thruster tech. Shares rose 0.36% to $336 in pre-market trading. Designer Franz von Holzhausen says the car is coming soon.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
48072436

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Tesla Inc. CEO Elon Musk revived speculation regarding the company’s long-delayed Roadster on Wednesday by promising that flying cars are imminent. Musk posted the three-word reply, "You will get flying cars," to a discussion contrasting rapid advances in artificial intelligence with the elusive arrival of aerial vehicles. While he did not explicitly identify Tesla or the Roadster in the post, the comment follows years of hints that the next-generation sports car could briefly leave the ground. This development matters to shareholders as it renews focus on Tesla’s high-margin vehicle segment and its integration with Space Exploration Technologies Corp. technology.

The statement follows a series of public comments from Musk regarding the Roadster’s capabilities. Last year, during an interview with Joe Rogan, Musk said, "We’re getting close to demonstrating the prototype," and promised an "unforgettable" demonstration. When asked about flying cars, he replied, "If Peter wants a flying car, he should be able to buy one," referring to billionaire Peter Thiel. Musk later described the Roadster as featuring "crazy, crazy technology" and questioned whether it was even a car, stating its technology would be "crazier" than combining every fictional James Bond car.

Roadster Technology and Performance

The concept of a flying Roadster stretches back further than recent comments. Musk has indicated that the Roadster’s optional Space Exploration Technologies Corp. package could use cold-gas thrusters to improve acceleration, braking, and cornering, allowing it to "fly very briefly." Tesla-linked material has described a thruster-equipped configuration capable of dramatically improving acceleration.

Despite these claims, Tesla still officially markets the Roadster as an electric supercar. The public specifications list a 1.9-second 0-to-60 mph time, a top speed of more than 250 mph, and a range of 620 miles. The company’s public Roadster page does not advertise sustained flight capability. In 2024, Musk said Tesla had "radically increased the design goals" for the vehicle, declaring, "There will never be another car like this, if you could even call it a car."

Production Timeline and Market Reaction

The Roadster remains years behind its original 2020 launch target. However, Tesla chief designer Franz von Holzhausen recently stated that the long-delayed second-generation Roadster is coming "very soon." During an episode of "Jay Leno’s Garage," which aired on Monday, von Holzhausen repeated this timeline when pressed by Jay Leno on the two-seater’s arrival.

In pre-market trading on Wednesday, Tesla shares were up 0.36% to $336. Benzinga Edge Rankings show Tesla stock scores poorly on Momentum and Value metrics but provides satisfactory Growth and Quality scores.

Key Metrics

Metric Value
Pre-market Price $336
Pre-market Change 0.36%
0-to-60 mph Time 1.9 seconds
Top Speed >250 mph
Range 620 miles

What the Numbers Show

The divergence between Tesla’s official marketing specifications and Musk’s public statements highlights a strategic tension in the company’s communication. While the financial metrics for the stock remain stable with a modest pre-market gain, the lack of concrete technical details on the "flying" capability suggests the announcement is primarily speculative rather than operational. Investors should note that the current official product description does not include flight capabilities, meaning any revenue impact from this feature remains theoretical until a prototype is demonstrated.

How might the integration of SpaceX cold-gas thruster technology impact Tesla's regulatory compliance and safety certification timelines?

Could the high production costs associated with the Roadster's advanced propulsion system dilute the vehicle's projected profit margins compared to other Tesla models?

What is the likelihood that the 'flying' capability will be limited to a niche, ultra-premium package rather than a standard feature for all Roadster buyers?

like17
dislike

Gary Black says investors lose faith in Tesla's autonomy scaling

scanx
Reviewed by
Riya DScanX News Team
Key Highlights

Gary Black highlights Tesla's reduced FSD growth targets and vision-only strategy as key factors eroding investor confidence. Comparing Tesla's 90-100 vehicle fleet to Waymo's 4,000 vehicles, Black suggests management concerns over safety are driving the slowdown. Tesla shares dipped 0.07% to $332.59 amid these ongoing doubts about scalability.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
48057359

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Investor Gary Black asserts that market participants are losing faith in Tesla Inc.'s ability to scale its unsupervised autonomous driving capabilities, citing a marked deceleration in deployment targets and strategic risks associated with its vision-only technology stack. The commentary, posted on X on August 11, 2026, highlights growing skepticism regarding the company's robotaxi ambitions as it faces increasing competition from Alphabet Inc.'s Waymo.

Black pointed to a series of downward revisions in Tesla's growth projections for its autonomous fleet. The company initially targeted serving half of the U.S. population by the end of 2025, but subsequently lowered its goal to doubling its fleet size every month following the first quarter. Most recently, AI Chief Ashok Elluswamy stated during the second-quarter earnings call that the current planned growth rate is +10% per week. Black interpreted this retreat from aggressive timelines as evidence that management may be concerned about safety limitations within the Full Self-Driving system.

The investor emphasized the reputational risk associated with rapid scaling, noting that even a single negative headline involving an FSD-related accident could cause significant damage. Consequently, he argued that the stock continues to underperform because investors doubt the technology can expand beyond its current roster of 90 to 100 unsupervised autonomous vehicles. This hesitation contrasts sharply with competitors who have achieved larger-scale operations without similar public delays.

Metric Tesla Inc. Waymo
Unsupervised Autonomous Vehicles 90–100 4,000
Weekly Robotaxi Rides Not specified >500,000
Growth Target +10%/week Not specified

Black compared Tesla's progress directly with Waymo, which operates 4,000 unsupervised autonomous vehicles without safety monitors and completes over 500,000 robotaxi rides per week. He suggested that Tesla's reluctance to scale faster indicates internal concerns that FSD may not be as safe as publicly portrayed. While acknowledging that Tesla continues to hire and build infrastructure under the assumption that it will solve edge cases and increase efficacy to 99.999%, Black warned that this approach carries inherent risks.

Strategic Risks of Vision-Only Approach

A central theme of Black's critique is Tesla's decision to pursue a vision-only route for economic reasons. He argued that this strategy forces the company to hope that competitors cannot develop safer self-driving technology by spending more on alternative sensor suites. Black advised against relying on management's assertions regarding proximity to solving unsupervised autonomy, stating that executives are "paid to be bullish." With three decades of experience in the industry, he emphasized that investors should not take managerial optimism at face value when assessing technological readiness.

Market sentiment reflected these concerns, with Tesla shares down 0.07% to $332.59 during overnight trading on Tuesday. Benzinga Edge Rankings indicated that Tesla scores poorly on Momentum and Value metrics, though it maintains satisfactory Growth and Quality scores. The shares also failed to show a favorable price trend across short, medium, and long-term horizons, underscoring the broader market caution surrounding the company's autonomous driving timeline.

How might Tesla's continued reliance on a vision-only architecture impact its ability to secure regulatory approval for unsupervised robotaxi operations in stricter jurisdictions compared to Waymo's multi-sensor approach?

What specific technological breakthroughs or data milestones would Tesla need to demonstrate in the next two quarters to reverse the current market skepticism regarding its +10% weekly growth target?

Could the widening operational gap between Tesla and Waymo in terms of fleet size and ride volume lead to a significant shift in institutional capital allocation toward Alphabet's autonomous driving division?

like19
dislike

More News on Tesla Inc