Tasty Dairy Specialities Posts FY26 Net Loss of ₹496.82 Lakhs Amid Ongoing CIRP
Tasty Dairy Specialities Limited reported audited standalone FY26 results with a net loss of ₹496.82 lakhs on revenue of ₹332.03 lakhs, down from ₹644.27 lakhs in FY25. The company continues under CIRP managed by Resolution Professional Anish Agarwal, with total assets of ₹5,805.10 lakhs and deeply negative equity of ₹3,469.68 lakhs. Auditors Neha B Agarwal & Co. issued a qualified opinion for the second consecutive year, and 11 resolution plans are under evaluation by the Committee of Creditors.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Tasty Dairy Specialities Limited has submitted its audited standalone financial results for the quarter and year ended March 31, 2026, to the Bombay Stock Exchange. The results were considered and approved by Resolution Professional Mr. Anish Agarwal on May 12, 2026. The company is currently undergoing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) pursuant to an order dated October 07, 2025, passed by the Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Allahabad Bench, on an application filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Punjab National Bank. The financial statements have been prepared on a non-going concern basis, reflecting the suspension of manufacturing operations and full erosion of net worth.
Financial Performance
The company reported a sharp contraction in operating activity for the fiscal year. Revenue from operations for FY26 stood at ₹332.03 lakhs, compared to ₹644.27 lakhs in the previous year. For the quarter ended March 31, 2026, no revenue from operations was recorded. The company posted a net loss of ₹496.82 lakhs for the full year, compared to a loss of ₹993.15 lakhs in FY25. Total expenses for FY26 were reduced to ₹889.11 lakhs, driven by lower finance costs and reduced material consumption. The following table summarises the key financial metrics across periods:
| Metric: | Q4 FY26 (Audited) | Q3 FY26 (Unaudited) | Q4 FY25 (Audited) | FY26 (Audited) | FY25 (Audited) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations (₹ Lakhs): | — | 7.80 | 202.08 | 332.03 | 644.27 |
| Other Income (₹ Lakhs): | 43.71 | 11.00 | 2.32 | 60.26 | 3.28 |
| Total Income (₹ Lakhs): | 43.71 | 18.80 | 204.40 | 392.29 | 647.55 |
| Total Expenses (₹ Lakhs): | 54.39 | 92.54 | 442.29 | 889.11 | 1,621.62 |
| Net Loss (₹ Lakhs): | (10.68) | (73.74) | (251.62) | (496.82) | (993.15) |
| Basic EPS (₹): | (0.05) | (0.36) | (1.23) | (2.43) | (4.86) |
Balance Sheet Position
The standalone balance sheet as of March 31, 2026, reflects the company's stressed financial position. Total assets stood at ₹5,805.10 lakhs, while equity turned deeply negative at ₹3,469.68 lakhs. Cash and cash equivalents increased significantly to ₹255.34 lakhs, primarily due to a Fixed Deposit of ₹2.30 crore created from Earnest Money Deposits received from prospective resolution applicants. Non-current borrowings rose to ₹3,973.67 lakhs from ₹2,790.25 lakhs in the prior year, while current borrowings stood at ₹962.99 lakhs.
| Parameter: | As at 31 March 2026 (₹ Lakhs) | As at 31 March 2025 (₹ Lakhs) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets: | 5,805.10 | 5,478.45 |
| Total Equity: | (3,469.68) | (2,972.86) |
| Non-Current Borrowings: | 3,973.67 | 2,790.25 |
| Current Borrowings: | 962.99 | 3,949.82 |
Auditor's Qualified Opinion
Statutory auditors Neha B Agarwal & Co. issued a qualified opinion on the standalone financial results. The qualifications include unresolved litigations where documentation was not fully available, non-recognition of asset sales made by the lending bank under the SARFAESI Act, and the absence of impairment testing for tangible assets pending CIRP completion. Additionally, certain requirements of Indian Accounting Standards could not be fully complied with due to operational constraints. The audit qualification is repetitive, occurring for the second consecutive year. The auditors noted that the consequential financial impact of these matters is currently not ascertainable.
CIRP Status and Related Party Transactions
The Resolution Professional has received Resolution Plans from 11 prospective applicants, which are under evaluation by the Committee of Creditors. Loans as at the reporting date amount to ₹49.36 crore, comprising secured bank borrowings from Punjab National Bank as per the books of account. Related party transactions during the half year ended March 31, 2026, included co-packing income of ₹22.65 lakhs and rental income of ₹27.80 lakhs from Agrim Foods LLP. An Earnest Money Deposit of ₹40.00 lakhs was received from Atul Mehra during the period, bringing the closing balance to ₹50.00 lakhs.
| Related Party Transaction: | Value (₹ Lakhs) |
|---|---|
| Sale of goods/services – Agrim Foods LLP: | 7.80 |
| Purchase of goods/services – Agrim Foods LLP: | 15.58 |
| Co-packing income – Agrim Foods LLP: | 22.65 |
| Rental income – Agrim Foods LLP: | 27.80 |
| Paid on behalf of company – Agrim Foods LLP: | 26.15 |
| EMD received – Atul Mehra: | 40.00 |
Impact of Audit Qualifications
The Statement on Impact of Audit Qualifications filed under Regulation 33 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, confirms that the audited figures remain unchanged before and after adjusting for qualifications, as the consequential impact is not ascertainable. Total income stands at ₹392.29 lakhs, total expenditure at ₹889.11 lakhs, net loss at ₹496.82 lakhs, and net worth at negative ₹3,469.68 lakhs. Management has stated that necessary adjustments, if any, will be accounted for upon completion of the CIRP and approval of the Resolution Plan by the Hon'ble NCLT.
With 11 resolution plans under evaluation by the Committee of Creditors, what is the likely timeline for NCLT approval, and which sectors or bidder profiles are most likely to emerge as successful resolution applicants for a dairy specialities company?
Given that Agrim Foods LLP is already engaged in co-packing and rental transactions with Tasty Dairy Specialities, could it potentially emerge as a resolution applicant, and what conflict-of-interest safeguards exist under IBC to address such related-party dynamics?
How might the unresolved SARFAESI Act asset sales by Punjab National Bank complicate the valuation and finalization of resolution plans, particularly if asset ownership disputes arise post-CIRP?






























