Sundaram Multi Pap approves all seven resolutions at 32nd AGM
- All seven resolutions at the 32nd AGM passed with requisite majorities
- Financial statements for FY26 adopted with 99.97% votes in favor
- Reappointments of MD and WTDs secured over 97% support from public shareholders
- No invalid votes recorded across all agenda items

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Sundaram Multi Pap Limited announced the results of its 32nd Annual General Meeting held on September 29, 2026. All seven proposed resolutions were passed with the requisite majority through electronic voting.
The meeting, conducted via Video Conferencing and Other Audio-Visual Means, saw participation from 76 shareholders. The scrutinizer's report, submitted to stock exchanges on October 1, 2026, confirmed that no invalid votes were recorded across any of the agenda items.
Key Resolutions Passed
The shareholders approved the adoption of audited standalone financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026. This ordinary resolution received overwhelming support, with 99.97% of valid votes cast in favor.
Additionally, the company approved the appointment of Shantilal P. Shah as a director retiring by rotation. This resolution also passed as an ordinary resolution with 99.52% votes in favor.
Director Reappointments
Four special resolutions regarding the reappointment of key managerial personnel and independent directors were passed:
- Amrut P. Shah was reappointed as Managing Director with 97.22% votes in favor.
- Shantilal P. Shah was reappointed as Whole-Time Director with 97.22% votes in favor.
- Krunal S. Shah was reappointed as Whole-Time Director with 99.92% votes in favor.
- Jyoti C. Gala was reappointed as Woman Independent Director for a second term of five years with 99.52% votes in favor.
- Mahesh D. Bhanushali was reappointed as Independent Director for a second term of five years with 99.52% votes in favor.
Voting Participation Details
The voting results highlight a significant disparity in participation between promoter and public shareholders. Promoter and promoter group entities voted on 14.74 crore shares for the first two resolutions, while public non-institutional shareholders voted on approximately 2.96 crore shares.
| Resolution | Type | Votes in Favor (%) | Votes Against (%) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of Financial Statements | Ordinary | 99.97 | 0.02 | Passed |
| Appointment of Shantilal P. Shah | Ordinary | 99.52 | 0.48 | Passed |
| Reappointment of Amrut P. Shah (MD) | Special | 97.22 | 2.78 | Passed |
| Reappointment of Shantilal P. Shah (WTD) | Special | 97.22 | 2.78 | Passed |
| Reappointment of Krunal S. Shah (WTD) | Special | 99.92 | 0.08 | Passed |
| Reappointment of Jyoti C. Gala (ID) | Special | 99.52 | 0.49 | Passed |
| Reappointment of Mahesh D. Bhanushali (ID) | Special | 99.52 | 0.49 | Passed |
What the Numbers Show
A distinct pattern emerges in the voting behavior regarding related-party transactions versus general corporate matters. For the reappointments of Amrut P. Shah and Shantilal P. Shah, where the promoter group is interested, the promoter group abstained from voting entirely. Consequently, the outcome relied solely on public shareholder approval, which stood at 97.22% in favor. In contrast, for the adoption of financial statements and the appointment of the retiring director (where promoters voted), the support rate exceeded 99.5%, indicating stronger consensus when promoter votes are included.
Historical Stock Returns for Sundaram Multi Pap
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.93% | -7.76% | -12.30% | -12.30% | -43.98% | -46.50% |
How will the confirmed leadership continuity under the Shah family influence Sundaram Multi Pap's strategic direction and capital expenditure plans for FY27?
What specific operational or financial challenges drove the 2.78% dissenting votes from public shareholders against the reappointment of the Managing Director and Whole-Time Director?
Given the dominance of promoter voting power, how might this governance structure impact the company's future eligibility for ESG-focused institutional investment mandates?





























