NCLAT upholds CIRP against Simbhaoli Sugars, dismisses appeals
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) pronounced its judgment on July 13, 2026, dismissing the appeal filed by promoter Ms. Gursimran Kaur Mann and disposing of the appeal filed by farmer Mr. Surender Pal Singh Mangat regarding the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Simbhaoli Sugars Limited. The tribunal upheld the admission of the Corporate Debtor into CIRP, rejecting arguments that the proceedings were initiated solely due to the Reserve Bank of India's February 12, 2018 circular, and confirming that debt and default were conclusively established. Consequently, all interim orders stand vacated, and pending interlocutory applications are closed. The company remains under CIRP pursuant to an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dated July 11, 2024, with Mr. Anurag Goel continuing as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has upheld the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Simbhaoli Sugars Limited, dismissing the appeal filed by promoter Ms. Gursimran Kaur Mann and disposing of the appeal filed by farmer Mr. Surender Pal Singh Mangat on July 13, 2026. Consequently, all interim orders stand vacated, and pending interlocutory applications are closed. The tribunal confirmed that the financial creditor, Oriental Bank of Commerce (now Punjab National Bank), had initiated recovery actions, including recalling the loan on November 1, 2017, prior to the Reserve Bank of India's February 12, 2018 circular, thereby validating the admission of the Corporate Debtor into CIRP.
The tribunal rejected arguments that the proceedings were initiated solely due to the RBI circular, which was struck down in the Dharani Sugars case. It noted that the debt and default were conclusively established, and no approved One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal was pending before the Joint Lenders Forum. The NCLAT found that the insolvency proceeding was independent of the RBI circular as the loan recall and legal notices preceded the circular's issuance.
Financial and Operational Context
Simbhaoli Sugars Limited had previously reported its audited consolidated financial results for the quarter and year ended March 31, 2026, with the statutory auditor issuing an adverse opinion. B.K. Kapur & Company stated that the financial statements did not give a true and fair view due to material uncertainties and non-compliance with Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS). The company incurred losses resulting in negative net worth and negative working capital, with defaults in payments to lenders and farmers casting significant doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern.
The adverse opinion was driven by the non-provision of interest expenses on bank borrowings amounting to ₹8,997.64 Lakhs for the quarter and ₹34,990.72 Lakhs for the year. The cumulative unprovided interest liability aggregates to ₹2,10,020.35 Lakhs as of March 31, 2026. Additionally, the company failed to assess impairment losses on investments in and receivables from its subsidiaries, Simbhaoli Power Private Limited (SPPL) and Integrated Casetech Consultants Private Limited (ICCPL), aggregating to ₹22,862.61 Lakhs and ₹655.72 Lakhs respectively.
| Qualification | Amount (₹ in Lakhs) | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Interest on bank borrowings (Quarter) | 8,997.64 | Understatement of loss and liabilities |
| Interest on bank borrowings (Year) | 34,990.72 | Understatement of loss and liabilities |
| Interest on unsecured related party loan (Year) | 43.81 | Understatement of loss and liabilities |
| Interest on delayed cane dues | 12,163.25 | Understatement of loss and liabilities |
| MSMED Act interest liability | 51.26 | Understatement of loss and liabilities |
Regulatory and Stakeholder Directions
Addressing concerns regarding sugarcane farmers, the NCLAT directed the Resolution Professional to consider their claims in accordance with the law. The tribunal referenced the IRP's affidavit confirming adherence to tagging orders issued by the District Magistrate for the disbursement of cane prices. Operational headwinds persist, including directions from the Central Pollution Control Board to stop manufacturing at distillery units and adverse cane area reservation orders affecting raw material supply.
Historical Stock Returns for Simbhaoli Sugars
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.45% | -1.19% | -2.34% | -27.50% | -57.57% | -82.17% |
How will the resolution professional address the massive ₹2,10,020.35 Lakhs in unprovided interest liabilities when formulating the resolution plan?
What impact will the Central Pollution Control Board's directive to stop manufacturing at distillery units have on the company's cash flow and valuation during the CIRP?
Will the adverse cane area reservation orders force potential bidders to factor in significant supply chain risks or operational restructuring?


































