Shankar Lal Rampal Dye-Chem receives police notice for document production
Shankar Lal Rampal Dye-Chem Ltd disclosed receiving a notice from Police Station Gariahat, West Bengal, under Section 94 of The Bharatia Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The notice, dated August 07, 2026, seeks documents for an investigation into case number 185, registered on August 01, 2026. The case alleges false representation and wrongful loss against the company, its promoters, and three others. The company denies the allegations and states there are no immediate financial implications.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Shankar Lal Rampal Dye-Chem has received a legal notice from Police Station Gariahat in West Bengal, marking the beginning of a formal investigation involving the company and its promoters. The notice, dated August 07, 2026, was issued under Section 94 of The Bharatia Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), compelling the production of specific documents. This development arises from an ongoing investigation linked to case number 185, which was registered on August 01, 2026.
The disclosure was made to the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited in compliance with Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company clarified that it became aware of the existence of the First Information Report (FIR) only upon receipt of this notice. As of the filing date, Shankar Lal Rampal Dye-Chem had not received a copy of the FIR itself.
The investigation centers on allegations of false representation and wrongful loss. The complainant in the matter is identified as Rajesh Kumar Biyani. The notice names the company, its promoters, and three other individuals as subjects of the inquiry. Management stated that the company categorically denies all allegations made by the complainant.
Investigation Details
The following table outlines the key particulars of the litigation as disclosed by the company:
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Opposing Party | Rajesh Kumar Biyani (Complainant) |
| Agency/Court | Police Station – Gariahat, West Bengal |
| Legal Provision | Section 94 of The Bharatia Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 |
| Case Number | 185 |
| Case Registration Date | August 01, 2026 |
| Notice Date | August 07, 2026 |
| Allegations | False representation and wrongful loss |
Financial Implications
The company assessed the immediate financial impact of this development as negligible. In its regulatory filing, Shankar Lal Rampal Dye-Chem stated that the expected financial implications, including any potential compensation or penalties, are "Not applicable." This assessment is based on the nature of the current proceeding, which is strictly a notice for the production of documents rather than a final order or judgment. Similarly, the quantum of claims is listed as not applicable at this stage.
What the Numbers Show
While no financial figures are directly attached to this notice, the timing of the events warrants attention. The gap between the case registration on August 01, 2026, and the receipt of the notice on August 07, 2026, suggests an active investigative phase. The fact that the company received the notice before the FIR copy indicates that law enforcement agencies are prioritizing evidence collection through Section 94 of the BNSS, 2023, which empowers them to call for documents relevant to an investigation. The denial of allegations by management implies that the company intends to contest the findings, potentially leading to prolonged legal proceedings. Investors should monitor subsequent filings for updates on the submission of documents and any further developments in the case.
How might the production of documents under Section 94 of the BNSS influence the company's stock price volatility in the short term?
What historical precedents exist for similar 'false representation' cases involving Indian dye-chem companies, and how were they resolved?
Could this legal scrutiny impact Shankar Lal Rampal Dye-Chem's ability to secure new banking facilities or credit lines during the investigation?























