Seshaasai promoters hold 81.8% stake in FY26
Seshaasai Technologies Ltd promoters Pragnyat Pravin Lalwani and Gautam Sampatraj Jain hold 40.90% each, totaling 81.80% of the equity as of March 31, 2026. The regulatory filing confirms no new encumbrances were placed on promoter shares during FY26.
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Seshaasai Technologies Ltd disclosed that its promoters collectively hold 81.80% of the company's total equity shares as of March 31, 2026. The disclosure was submitted to the stock exchanges in compliance with Regulation 31(4) of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011.
The filing, made by Gautam Sampatraj Jain on behalf of the promoter and promoter group, details the shareholding pattern for the financial year ending March 31, 2026. It confirms that the promoters, along with Persons Acting in Concert (PAC) or the promoter group, did not create any encumbrance on the shares held during the financial year, other than those previously disclosed.
Shareholding Details
The shareholding is concentrated among two primary promoters. The promoter group entities hold a nominal number of shares, while several listed entities hold zero shares.
| Name | No. of Shares | % Holding |
|---|---|---|
| Promoters | ||
| Pragnyat Pravin Lalwani | 66180779 | 40.90 |
| Gautam Sampatraj Jain | 66180780 | 40.90 |
| Promoter Group | ||
| Sunita Gautam Jain | 30 | 0.00 |
| Gautam Jain HUF | 20 | 0.00 |
| Pranati R Patil | 20 | 0.00 |
The remaining entities listed in the promoter group, including Sunita Pravin Lalwani, Pranjal Banthia, and various private limited companies such as Creative Formulations (India) Private Limited and Dandelion Technologies Private Limited, reported zero shareholdings.
Historical Stock Returns for Seshaasai Technologies
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.43% | +3.76% | +3.82% | -7.18% | -32.00% | -32.00% |
Does the high promoter concentration of 81.80% indicate potential plans for delisting or a lack of interest in diversifying the shareholder base?
Could the equal split between the two primary promoters lead to future governance challenges or decision-making deadlocks?
Are there any strategic intentions by the promoters to reduce their stake to unlock value for public shareholders?
19
Access Market Heat-map & Insights 
Create, Save & Share your Screener 
Use 200+ Screening Filters 
