Saurashtra Cement gets IT order allowing appeal partly for AY 2020-21
Saurashtra Cement Limited received an appellate order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, dated July 10, 2026, partly allowing its appeal for AY 2020-21. The company confirmed no additional financial impact and is filing a second appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Saurashtra Cement Limited has received an order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC), dated July 10, 2026, allowing the company's appeal partly for the Assessment Year 2020-21. The order was received by the company on July 11, 2026. The company stated that there will be no additional financial impact on its operations due to this appellate order.
Following the receipt of the order, the company is initiating further legal action. It is filing a second appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot, against the appellate order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
The disclosure was made to the exchanges under Regulation 30 read with Para B of Part A of Schedule III of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Details of the Order
| Sr. No. | Details | Information |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Name of the authority | The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC) |
| 2. | Nature of action | Appellate order passed u/s 250 allowing the company's appeal partly for AY 2020-21 |
| 3. | Date of receipt of Order | July 11, 2026 |
| 4. | Financial impact | No additional financial impact |
| 5. | Action taken | Filing second appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot |
Historical Stock Returns for Saurashtra Cement
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.40% | -1.31% | -5.20% | -28.40% | -38.73% | -52.88% |
What is the expected timeline for the resolution of the second appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal?
What specific grounds is Saurashtra Cement citing to challenge the portions of the order that were not allowed in its favor?
How might the ongoing legal proceedings affect the company's cash flow management or tax provisioning strategies in the interim?































