Securities Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Jetking Infotrain Appeal Against BSE Listing Rejection
The Securities Appellate Tribunal dismissed Jetking Infotrain's appeal against BSE's rejection of its preferential issue listing. The tribunal cited non-compliances regarding VDA investments and MoA disclosures. No monetary penalty was imposed, but the shares remain unlisted.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Jetking Infotrain Limited has announced that the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), Mumbai, has dismissed an appeal filed by the company regarding the rejection of its listing application by the BSE. The order, dated May 8, 2026, pertains to Appeal No. 474 of 2025 and was made available to the company on the same date. The tribunal's decision effectively upholds the stock exchange's refusal to list shares issued through a preferential allotment.
The background of the case involves a preferential issue of shares for which the company had sought a listing. The BSE had rejected this application, prompting Jetking Infotrain to approach the SAT. In its order, the SAT identified specific non-compliances that led to the dismissal of the appeal. The tribunal noted that the company utilized the proceeds from the preferential issue to invest in Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) before the Registrar of Companies (RoC) certified the second amendment to the Memorandum of Association (MoA), which permitted such investments. The RoC certified this amendment on July 7, 2025.
Furthermore, the SAT found that the company did not disclose the first MoA amendment to the BSE before obtaining in-principle approval or while filing the listing application on June 10, 2025. These actions were held to be ultra vires the MoA as it existed at the relevant time. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the rejection of the listing application stands.
The following table summarizes the key details of the SAT order and the implications for the company:
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Name of Company | Jetking Infotrain Limited |
| Type of Communication | Order dated May 8, 2026 passed by the Hon'ble Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), Mumbai in Appeal filed by the Company under Section 22A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956. |
| Date of Receipt | May 8, 2026 |
| Applicability Period | Effective from May 8, 2026. No specific prospective applicability period stated. |
| Financial Implications | The order upholds the BSE's rejection of the listing application for the preferential allotment shares. Consequently, these shares cannot be listed on BSE at this stage. |
| Non-Compliances Identified | Utilised preferential issue proceeds to invest in VDAs prior to RoC certification of MoA amendment; did not disclose the first MoA amendment to BSE prior to obtaining in-principle approval or filing the listing application. |
| Penalty or Sanction | No monetary penalty or fine imposed. The dismissal upholds the BSE rejection. No order as to costs. |
Regarding the financial impact, the company stated that the order upholds the BSE's rejection, meaning the shares allotted pursuant to the preferential issue cannot be listed on the exchange at this stage. Jetking Infotrain is currently evaluating the financial and legal implications of the order. The company has confirmed that no monetary penalty or fine has been imposed by the SAT, nor was there an order regarding costs.
In response to the order, Jetking Infotrain stated that it is evaluating the implications of the SAT decision, including the available legal remedies in accordance with the law. The company has assured that any further material developments in this matter will be disclosed to the public in compliance with the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Historical Stock Returns for Jetking Infotrain
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.28% | -0.21% | +4.77% | -40.59% | -7.82% | +218.09% |
Will Jetking Infotrain appeal the SAT dismissal to the Supreme Court, and what timeline could such a legal challenge realistically take?
How will the continued unlisted status of the preferential allotment shares impact the company's ability to raise fresh capital or attract institutional investors in the near term?
Could SEBI initiate separate enforcement action against Jetking Infotrain for the premature utilisation of proceeds in Virtual Digital Assets and the non-disclosure of the MoA amendment?


































