Rishi Techtex shareholders approve FY26 financials and related party deal
- Shareholders approved FY26 financials and director re-appointment with 99.97% support
- Material transaction with Centennial Fabrics Limited approved by non-promoter shareholders
- Promoters abstained from voting on related party deal per SEBI Regulation 23(4)
- Total participation for routine resolutions was 40.19% of outstanding shares

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Rishi Techtex Limited has disclosed the combined voting results and scrutinizer report for its 42nd Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on September 24, 2026. All resolutions, including the adoption of FY26 financial statements and a material related-party transaction, were approved with the requisite majority.
The meeting was conducted via Video Conferencing/Other Audio Visual Means (VC/OAVM). A total of 46 members participated remotely, comprising 5 from the promoter group and 41 from the public. The proceedings complied with the Companies Act, 2013, and SEBI Listing Regulations, with e-voting facilitated by Central Depository Services (India) Limited (CDSL).
Voting outcomes on key resolutions
Shareholders voted on three primary agenda items. The audited financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2026, and the re-appointment of director Aakanksha Mikhail Verma received overwhelming support. However, the material transaction with Centennial Fabrics Limited saw distinct voting patterns due to regulatory restrictions on promoter participation.
| Resolution | Type | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | % In Favour |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of FY26 Financials | Ordinary | 2,969,839 | 993 | 99.97% |
| Director Re-appointment | Ordinary | 2,969,839 | 993 | 99.97% |
| Related Party Transaction | Ordinary | 85,434 | 993 | 98.85% |
For the related-party transaction, promoters holding 2,885,248 equity shares abstained from voting as prohibited under Regulation 23(4) of SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015. Consequently, the resolution was decided solely by non-institutional public shareholders, who cast 86,427 votes, with 85,434 in favour and 993 against.
Governance and compliance details
The scrutinizer, Sudhanwa S. Kalamkar of Sudhanwa S. Kalamkar and Associates, certified the results based on remote and venue e-voting data from CDSL. Remote e-voting remained open from September 20 to September 23, 2026. The cut-off date for eligibility was September 17, 2026.
Key officials present included Jagdish Dokwal (CFO) and Gauri Gangal (Company Secretary). Directors Abhishek Patel, Aakanksha Mikhail Verma, Kunal Rastogi, and Pranab Kumar Chatterjee attended the meeting virtually. Statutory registers were available for inspection at the registered office and via email, ensuring transparency for shareholders without registered email addresses through provided weblinks.
What the Numbers Show
The voting data highlights a significant divergence in shareholder engagement between routine governance items and related-party dealings. While total votes polled for financial adoption stood at 2,970,832 (representing 40.19% of outstanding shares), participation for the related-party transaction dropped sharply to 86,427 votes (2.01% of outstanding shares). This disparity is structurally driven by the mandatory exclusion of promoter shares, which constitute 41.98% of the company's equity base, leaving institutional interest negligible and placing the decision entirely in the hands of retail investors.
Historical Stock Returns for Rishi Techtex
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.13% | +6.93% | +12.02% | +18.66% | -11.98% | +53.51% |
How might the material related-party transaction with Centennial Fabrics Limited impact Rishi Techtex's future operational synergies and cost structures?
Given the low retail participation in related-party voting, what measures will management implement to improve minority shareholder engagement in future governance decisions?
Will the approval of this specific transaction set a precedent for the frequency or scale of future related-party dealings by the promoter group?
































