Progress Software Q3FY26 Results: Consensus sees $1.52 EPS, $247M revenue
- Progress Software releases Q3 earnings on September 30 with consensus EPS of $1.52
- Revenue forecast at $247.14 million, down from $249.79 million in the prior year
- Guggenheim maintains highest price target at $83; Jefferies holds lowest at $34
- Bridget Collins appointed Chief Information Officer on August 18

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) will release third-quarter earnings after the closing bell on Wednesday, September 30. The Burlington, Massachusetts-based company faces a consensus estimate of $1.52 per share, a slight increase from the $1.50 per share reported in the year-ago period.
Analysts project quarterly revenue of $247.14 million. This forecast sits below the $249.79 million reported in the same quarter last year, indicating a potential contraction in top-line performance despite the modest earnings per share growth.
Analyst Sentiment and Price Targets
Recent actions from Wall Street analysts reflect diverging views on the stock's valuation. While most firms maintained their rating categories, several adjusted price targets downward in recent months.
| Analyst Firm | Analyst | Rating | Price Target Change | Date | Accuracy Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DA Davidson | Lucky Schreiner | Buy | Raised to $55 (from $45) | August 12, 2026 | 51% |
| Guggenheim | John Difucci | Buy | Maintained at $83 | July 1, 2026 | 70% |
| Oppenheimer | Ittai Kidron | Outperform | Cut to $50 (from $57) | July 1, 2026 | 78% |
| Citigroup | Fatima Boolani | Buy | Cut to $46 (from $60) | April 1, 2026 | 79% |
| Jefferies | Brent Thill | Hold | Slashed to $34 (from $45) | March 31, 2026 | 73% |
What the Numbers Show
A divergence exists between revenue expectations and earnings forecasts. The consensus revenue of $247.14 million is lower than the prior year's $249.79 million, yet the expected EPS of $1.52 exceeds the previous year's $1.50. This suggests that analysts anticipate margin expansion or cost efficiencies to drive profitability even as top-line revenue potentially declines.
Additionally, the spread in price targets is significant. Guggenheim's $83 target contrasts sharply with Jefferies' $34 target, highlighting a wide range of opinion on Progress Software's valuation amidst mixed recent revisions.
Will Progress Software's Q3 earnings reveal specific cost-saving initiatives or margin expansion strategies that offset the projected revenue decline?
How might the significant divergence in analyst price targets, ranging from $34 to $83, impact institutional investor confidence following the earnings release?
What are the potential implications for Progress Software's long-term growth strategy if top-line contraction continues despite modest EPS improvements?




























