Panacea Biotec Independent Director CA Rajesh Jain Resigns Due to Professional Commitments

1 min read     Updated on 30 Mar 2026, 11:53 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Panacea Biotec Limited announced CA Rajesh Jain's resignation as Non-Executive Independent Director effective June 30, 2026, citing professional commitments and increasing regulatory demands. The resignation applies to both the company and its subsidiary Panacea Biotec Pharma Limited. He will also step down from all Board Committee positions. The company expressed appreciation for his contributions during his tenure.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
36440626

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Panacea Biotec Limited announced the resignation of CA Rajesh Jain as Non-Executive Independent Director, effective from the close of business hours on June 30, 2026. The resignation applies to both the company and its material wholly owned subsidiary, Panacea Biotec Pharma Limited.

Resignation Details

CA Rajesh Jain (DIN: 10619014) submitted his resignation via email on March 30, 2026. His decision stems from existing professional commitments and the increasing time demands arising from evolving regulatory and corporate governance requirements, resulting in his inability to devote adequate time, attention, and diligence required for the role.

Parameter: Details
Director Name: CA Rajesh Jain
DIN: 10619014
Position: Non-Executive Independent Director
Resignation Date: March 30, 2026
Effective Date: June 30, 2026
Reason: Professional commitments and regulatory demands

Committee Positions Impact

Consequently, CA Jain will cease to be the Chairman or member of various Board Committees of both companies effective from the close of business hours on June 30, 2026, or such other earlier date as may be decided by the Board. His committee positions include:

  • Audit Committee
  • Nomination and Remuneration Committee
  • Various other Board Committees

Other Directorships

CA Rajesh Jain currently holds directorships in other listed entities:

Listed Entity: Committee Positions
Federal-Mogul Goetze (India) Limited: Member: Nomination and Remuneration, CSR, Share Transfer, Audit, Risk Management Committees; Chairman: Stakeholders' Relationship Committee
Sundrop Brands Limited: Member: Nomination and Remuneration, Stakeholders' Relationship, Risk Management, CSR Committees; Chairman: Audit Committee

Company Statement

The Board of Directors and Management of Panacea Biotec Limited and Panacea Biotec Pharma Limited expressed deep appreciation and gratitude to CA Rajesh Jain for his contribution and guidance towards the business growth during his association with both companies. CA Jain confirmed that there are no other material reasons for his resignation beyond those mentioned.

Regulatory Compliance

The resignation disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, along with the required annexures including the resignation letters and detailed information as per SEBI Master Circular dated November 11, 2024.

Historical Stock Returns for Panacea Biotec

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-0.58%-1.55%-2.30%-19.35%-28.48%+69.76%

How will Panacea Biotec's board composition and governance structure change following the appointment of CA Jain's replacement?

What impact might the leadership transition in key committees have on Panacea Biotec's strategic decision-making and regulatory compliance?

Will this resignation signal broader challenges in retaining independent directors across the pharmaceutical industry due to increasing regulatory burdens?

Panacea Biotec's Tax Appeals Dismissed, Faces ₹9.38 Crore Penalty Demand

2 min read     Updated on 28 Mar 2026, 03:33 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Panacea Biotec Limited faced a setback as CIT(A) dismissed its appeals against ₹9.38 crore penalty orders for alleged income under-reporting across assessment years 2017-18, 2020-21, and 2021-22. The company maintains the demand is not maintainable and plans to appeal to higher authorities. Despite the substantial penalty amount, Panacea Biotec expects no material impact on its financial or operational activities.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
36194595

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Panacea Biotec Limited has encountered a significant legal setback as the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi dismissed its appeals against penalty orders totaling ₹9.38 crore. The ruling, dated March 25, 2026 and received on March 26, 2026, represents an adverse development in the company's ongoing tax litigation proceedings.

Background of Tax Dispute

The penalty orders were originally issued on December 24, 2025, by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi, for alleged under-reporting of income. The dispute spans three assessment years, creating a comprehensive challenge to the company's tax compliance across multiple financial periods.

Assessment Details: Information
Total Penalty Amount: ₹9.38 crore
Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2020-21, 2021-22
Original Orders Date: December 24, 2025
CIT(A) Dismissal Date: March 25, 2026
Authority: Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi

Company's Response and Next Steps

Panacea Biotec has maintained a firm stance against the penalty orders, asserting that the demand is not maintainable. The company's assessment indicates strong grounds for challenging the ruling at higher judicial levels. Following the dismissal by CIT(A), the pharmaceutical manufacturer is taking necessary steps to file an appeal with the appellate authority.

The company has emphasized its commitment to pursuing all available legal remedies to contest the penalty orders. This approach demonstrates the organization's confidence in its tax compliance practices and its willingness to defend its position through the judicial process.

Financial and Operational Impact Assessment

Despite the substantial penalty amount involved, Panacea Biotec has provided reassurance regarding the potential impact on its business operations. The company's management has stated that it does not envisage any relevant impact on financial, operational, or other activities of the organization.

Impact Assessment: Company Position
Financial Impact: No relevant impact envisaged
Operational Impact: No relevant impact envisaged
Business Activities: No relevant impact expected
Legal Strategy: Appeal to appellate authority

Regulatory Compliance and Disclosure

The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, demonstrating the company's commitment to maintaining transparency with stakeholders. This update follows the company's previous communication dated December 26, 2025, ensuring continuous information flow regarding the litigation proceedings.

The comprehensive disclosure includes all requisite details as mandated under SEBI regulations, reflecting the company's adherence to corporate governance standards. The filing was executed by Ankit Jain, General Manager – Legal & Company Secretary, on March 27, 2026, ensuring timely communication to both NSE and BSE.

Historical Stock Returns for Panacea Biotec

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-0.58%-1.55%-2.30%-19.35%-28.48%+69.76%

What are the potential financial implications if Panacea Biotec's appeal to the higher appellate authority is also dismissed?

Could this tax dispute signal broader scrutiny of pharmaceutical companies' income reporting practices by Indian tax authorities?

How might this ongoing litigation affect Panacea Biotec's credit ratings and access to capital markets in the near term?

More News on Panacea Biotec

1 Year Returns:-28.48%