Oneindig Technologies MD served non-bailable warrant by consumer court
- Managing Director served with non-bailable warrant by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Faridabad on September 23, 2026
- Warrant issued regarding alleged non-compliance of order dated January 8, 2025, in Execution Petition No. U/S 72/73
- Company filed applications for warrant recall and objections under Section 47 CPC, stating no material impact on operations
- Oneindig Technologies claims it was never served with notice or copy of the original order, preventing compliance timeline initiation
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Oneindig Technologies disclosed that its Managing Director was served with a non-bailable warrant issued by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Faridabad, on September 23, 2026. The warrant stems from an execution petition regarding alleged non-compliance with a previous order.
The company filed an intimation with BSE under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The legal action relates to Execution Petition No. U/S 72/73 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The specific violation cited is the alleged failure to comply with an order dated January 8, 2025, passed by the same commission.
Legal Proceedings and Compliance Status
The commission issued the warrant due to alleged non-compliance of the order dated January 8, 2025. Oneindig Technologies stated that it has taken immediate legal advice to address the situation. The company has submitted an application for the recall and cancellation of the non-bailable warrant on behalf of Manoj Agrawal.
Additionally, detailed objections were filed under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) in the present execution petition. An application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC was also filed in CC No. 67/2024 to set aside the order dated January 8, 2025.
Company's Defense and Operational Impact
Oneindig Technologies asserted that it was never served with notice of the complaint and did not receive a copy of the order, despite directives that copies be supplied free of cost. The company noted that compliance was due only within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order copy, a period that never began to run. Furthermore, the company stated it has not received any payment from the complainant.
Regarding business continuity, the company confirmed that operations continue normally. It assessed that this event is not expected to have any material impact on the financial or operational performance of the entity. The matter remains confined to an execution process for a consumer dispute.
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Issuing Authority | District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Faridabad |
| Nature of Action | Issuance of warrant in Execution Petition No. U/S 72/73 |
| Date of Receipt | September 23, 2026 |
| Alleged Violation | Non-compliance of order dated January 8, 2025 |
| Impact Assessment | No material impact on financial or operational performance |
Historical Stock Returns for Oneindig Technologies
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.90% | -0.92% | -7.25% | +39.58% | +39.58% | +39.58% |
How might the pending recall application and CPC objections influence the timeline for resolving the execution petition?
What are the potential regulatory consequences if SEBI deems the initial non-compliance a violation of corporate governance norms?
Could this legal dispute trigger increased scrutiny from investors regarding the company's consumer grievance handling processes?
20
Create Custom Screeners 
Access 200+ Pre-built Filters 
Use 50+ Readymade Screener 
