NurExone advances optic nerve injury program to larger-animal study
- NurExone announced positive preclinical results for ExoPTEN in optic nerve injury models
- ExoPTEN-treated eyes showed statistically significant improvement in retinal response (p = 0.04)
- Naïve exosomes reached ~5 microvolts, meeting the threshold for measurable retinal activity
- Program advances to larger-animal studies, including a planned rabbit model
- Corrective disclosure issued regarding RedChip investor relations agreement dates

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
NurExone Biologic Inc. (TSXV: NRX) announced new preclinical findings demonstrating that its lead drug candidate, ExoPTEN, and naïve exosomes preserve retinal activity following optic nerve injury. The results support advancing the program into larger-animal studies, including a planned rabbit model.
Preclinical efficacy signals
The studies, conducted with Prof. Ygal Rotenstreich’s team at the Goldschleger Eye Institute at Sheba Medical Center, utilized an optic nerve crush model in rats. Electroretinography (ERG) assessments revealed that treated eyes exhibited measurable electrical responses to light, whereas injured eyes in the control group showed significantly weaker responses.
ExoPTEN-treated eyes demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in retinal response compared to the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control group (p = 0.04). At higher light intensities, the naïve exosome group reached an average response of approximately 5 microvolts (µV), which served as the study’s threshold for a measurable retinal response. The ExoPTEN group exceeded this threshold, while the PBS control group remained below it.
Study metrics and outcomes
The study compared uninjured eyes against injured eyes treated with PBS, naïve exosomes, or ExoPTEN. The primary metric was the STR-ERG amplitude, reflecting retinal ganglion cell-related function.
| Group | Treatment | Retinal Response Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Control | PBS | Below 5 µV threshold |
| Naïve Exosomes | NurExone naïve exosomes | ~5 µV (measurable) |
| ExoPTEN | ExoPTEN formulation | >5 µV (statistically significant) |
| Uninjured | No treatment | Highest response |
Note: Statistical significance for ExoPTEN vs. PBS control reported at p = 0.04 using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction.
What the numbers show
The data highlights a clear dose-response or efficacy hierarchy where ExoPTEN outperforms both the negative control and, in terms of statistical significance against the control, matches or exceeds the intrinsic activity of naïve exosomes. The fact that naïve exosomes alone reached the measurable threshold of 5 µV suggests inherent biological activity in the base platform, while ExoPTEN’s superior performance reinforces the therapeutic rationale for adding specific cargo. The lack of a reported statistically significant difference between ExoPTEN and naïve exosomes in this specific figure indicates that while ExoPTEN is effective, the baseline exosome platform itself contributes substantially to neural preservation.
Program roadmap
These findings build on previously announced studies showing structural preservation and retinal ganglion cell survival. The next phase involves a proposed rabbit model to evaluate delivery, dosing, tolerability, and safety. The initiation of this study remains subject to final protocol development, funding, and regulatory approvals.
Dr. Lior Shaltiel, Chief Executive Officer of NurExone, stated that the findings support the expansion of the program into the proposed rabbit study. Prof. Rotenstreich noted that treated eyes showed clear, measurable retinal activity, supporting continued development for vision-threatening conditions.
Corrective disclosure
NurExone also corrected disclosure regarding its investor relations agreement with RedChip Companies, Inc. The agreement was dated September 15, 2026, not September 8, 2026, as previously stated. It has a 180-day term beginning September 30, 2026, following TSX Venture Exchange approval.
What specific funding sources or regulatory milestones are required to initiate the proposed rabbit model study?
How will the transition from rat to rabbit models impact the projected timeline for ExoPTEN's entry into human clinical trials?
Given the inherent activity of naïve exosomes, how does NurExone plan to differentiate ExoPTEN’s commercial value and IP position from generic exosome therapies?

































