Norris Medicines shareholders pass all six resolutions at 35th AGM
- All six resolutions at the 35th AGM were passed with requisite majorities
- Mr. Vimal D. Shah's MD appointment passed with 99.37% valid vote support
- Promoter votes were excluded as invalid for the interested-party resolution
- Financial statements for FY26 and director reappointments received 99.59% support

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Norris Medicines Limited shareholders approved all six resolutions proposed at the company's 35th Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on September 29, 2026. The meeting, conducted via video conferencing, saw significant voting support for key corporate actions, including the reappointment of the Managing Director and enhancements to borrowing limits.
The scrutinizer's report confirmed that every resolution passed with the requisite majority. Voting rights were reckoned as of September 22, 2026. The meeting was held in compliance with SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, and the Companies Act, 2013, utilizing remote e-voting facilities provided by Purva Sharegistry India Pvt. Ltd.
Key resolutions passed
The ordinary business items included the adoption of audited financial statements for FY26 and the reappointment of Mr. Praveen J. Bafna as a director retiring by rotation. Both items received overwhelming support from both promoter and public shareholders.
Special business items focused on governance and financial flexibility. These included the appointment of Mr. Vimal D. Shah as Managing Director, an increase in borrowing limits, authorization for the disposal of undertaking, and enhancement of investment limits under Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013.
What the numbers show
A distinct pattern emerged in the voting data for the special resolution regarding Mr. Vimal D. Shah's appointment. While promoters voted in favor, their votes were classified as "invalid" for the purpose of determining the result because Mr. Shah is an interested party. Consequently, the resolution passed based solely on public shareholder votes, which constituted 43,52,529 votes in favor against 27,660 votes against. This highlights a governance structure where promoter influence is legally restricted in self-dealing matters, yet public shareholder consensus remained strong at 99.37% support among valid votes.
Voting results summary
The following table summarizes the voting outcomes for the six resolutions passed at the AGM:
| Resolution | Type | Votes in Favor (%) | Votes Against (%) | Invalid Votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of FY26 Financial Statements | Ordinary | 99.59 | 0.41 | Nil |
| Reappointment of Mr. Praveen J. Bafna | Ordinary | 99.59 | 0.41 | Nil |
| Appointment of Mr. Vimal D. Shah as MD | Special | 99.37 | 0.63 | 23,60,441 |
| Increase in Borrowing Limits | Special | 99.59 | 0.41 | Nil |
| Authorization for Sale/Disposal of Undertaking | Special | 99.59 | 0.41 | Nil |
| Enhancement of Section 186 Limits | Special | 99.59 | 0.41 | Nil |
Note: Percentages are calculated based on valid votes cast. Invalid votes are excluded from the favor/against calculation.
The high consistency in voting patterns across five of the six resolutions suggests aligned shareholder interests regarding the company's operational and financial strategy. The only deviation occurred in the Managing Director appointment, where regulatory requirements mandated the exclusion of interested party votes.
Historical Stock Returns for Norris Medicines
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -4.95% | -3.89% | +15.41% | +41.57% | +8.73% | +94.09% |
How will the newly increased borrowing limits be deployed to support Norris Medicines' specific growth initiatives or capital expenditure plans in the coming fiscal year?
What strategic rationale underpins the authorization for the disposal of undertakings, and which non-core assets are likely candidates for divestiture?
How might Mr. Vimal D. Shah's appointment as Managing Director influence the company's operational strategy or market positioning compared to the previous leadership structure?


































