Nitta Gelatin India Limited has closed its trading window effective October 1, 2026. This measure precedes the announcement of the company's un-audited financial results for the quarter and half-year ending September 30, 2026.

The restriction applies to all designated persons and their immediate relatives. It remains in force until 48 hours after the financial results are disclosed to the stock exchanges.

Regulatory compliance and timeline

The decision aligns with the company's Code of Conduct for Prohibition of Insider Trading. This code is framed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, as amended.

The intimation was filed with BSE Ltd on September 25, 2026. Vinod Mohan, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer, signed the document digitally.

Key dates and scope

The company operates as a joint venture between Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd and Nitta Gelatin Inc. Its registered office is located in Ernakulam, Kerala.

Shareholders of Nitta Gelatin India Limited have approved the appointment of Mr. Arun K Vijayan IAS as a Nominee Director on the company’s Board. The resolution was passed through a postal ballot process concluded on September 8, 2026, with results declared on September 9, 2026.

The appointment follows a nomination by Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation Limited (KSIDC), a joint venture partner alongside Nitta Gelatin Inc. Mr. Vijayan’s term is subject to retirement by rotation as per the Companies Act, 2013.

Voting Breakdown

The ordinary resolution required simple majority approval. Of the 9,079,160 total shares eligible to vote, 6,835,310 votes were polled, representing a participation rate of 75.29%.

Promoter shareholders cast unanimous support, voting all held shares in favour. Among public shareholders, institutional investors showed slightly lower support at 93.87% compared to non-institutional investors at 96.28%. However, dissent remained minimal overall, with only 0.05% of total polled votes cast against the resolution.

What the Numbers Show

The voting pattern highlights a distinct divergence between promoter and public shareholder engagement. While promoters participated at 100% capacity, public shareholder participation was significantly lower, with institutions polling only 19.59% of their holdings and non-institutions just 2.44%. Despite this lower turnout among retail and institutional public shareholders, the high margin of approval (99.95%) indicates broad consensus on the board composition change driven by the state-owned partner KSIDC.