New Markets Avenue Q1 Results: Loss widens to ₹25.49 lakh
New Markets Avenue Ltd reported a Q1FY27 net loss of ₹25.49 lakh, driven by rising employee and other expenses amid zero operational revenue. The firm utilized ₹2.64 crore of its ₹5.02 crore preferential issue proceeds for working capital and pre-op costs.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
New Markets Avenue reported a net loss of ₹25.49 lakh for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, reversing a profit position from the corresponding period last year. The Mumbai-based financial services firm posted no revenue from operations, relying entirely on ₹1.80 lakh in other income to generate total revenue. This stands in sharp contrast to the previous quarter, where the company also reported zero operational revenue but incurred lower overall costs.
The widening loss was driven by a significant spike in operating expenses, which totaled ₹27.29 lakh for the quarter. Employee benefits expense alone accounted for ₹18.60 lakh, more than double the ₹8.85 lakh reported in the preceding quarter. Other expenses also nearly doubled to ₹8.66 lakh from ₹4.01 lakh. The Board of Directors approved these unaudited financial results on August 11, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Financial Performance
The company’s basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) stood at ₹(0.52), down from a positive EPS of ₹0.63 in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. For the full fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, New Markets Avenue had reported a net loss of ₹31.75 lakh against total revenue of ₹19.59 lakh.
| Particulars | Q1FY27 (₹ in Lakhs) | Q4FY26 (₹ in Lakhs) | Q1FY26 (₹ in Lakhs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | - | - | 11.75 |
| Other Income | 1.80 | 0.34 | - |
| Total Revenue | 1.80 | 0.34 | 11.75 |
| Total Expenses | 27.29 | 12.92 | 3.92 |
| Net Profit / (Loss) | (25.49) | (12.58) | 7.83 |
Fund Utilization Disclosure
Alongside the financial results, the company filed a statement on deviation or variation in the utilization of funds raised under Regulation 32 of the SEBI Listing Regulations. The firm raised ₹5,02,50,000 through a preferential issue on November 27, 2025, primarily for working capital requirements and pre-operating expenses.
As of June 30, 2026, the company utilized ₹2,64,18,489 of the raised funds. The breakdown includes ₹30,66,569 for pre-operative expenses and ₹1,10,84,881 for working capital used for business purposes. Additional expenditures covered salary, RTA payments, software and technology costs, and exchange fees. The company reported no deviation or variation in the use of funds, and no monitoring agency was appointed for this fundraising exercise.
What the Numbers Show
The complete absence of revenue from operations in Q1FY27, combined with a doubling of employee benefits expense, suggests ongoing structural costs despite a lack of business activity. The reliance on other income for total revenue highlights a gap between the company’s operational output and its cash burn rate. With over half of the raised preferential issue funds already deployed towards pre-operative and working capital needs, the pressure to generate operational revenue will intensify in subsequent quarters.
Historical Stock Returns for New Markets Avenue
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.98% | +15.82% | +27.67% | +374.98% | +476.44% | +476.44% |
Given the complete absence of operational revenue in Q1FY27, what specific milestones or product launches is New Markets Avenue targeting to generate its first commercial income in the upcoming quarters?
With over 52% of the preferential issue funds already utilized for pre-operative expenses and working capital, how many quarters of runway remain before the company requires additional capital infusion?
Why have employee benefits expenses more than doubled quarter-over-quarter despite zero operational output, and does this indicate a hiring surge for a pending project or a structural cost inefficiency?


































