MTNL Reports Net Loss of ₹3,103 Cr for FY26
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited reported a net loss of ₹3,102.94 crore for FY26, with revenue from operations at ₹817.27 crore. The standalone Q4 loss was ₹304.46 crore. The Board approved the audited results and appointed a new CFO. Auditors issued an adverse opinion, citing material uncertainty regarding the company's status as a going concern.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited has reported its audited standalone and consolidated financial results for the quarter and year ended March 31, 2026. The company recorded a net loss of ₹3,102.94 crore for the fiscal year 2025-26, compared to a net loss of ₹3,323.51 crore in the previous year. Revenue from operations for the year stood at ₹817.27 crore, while total income was ₹1,279.75 crore. On a consolidated basis, Q4 net loss stood at ₹306.95 crore against a loss of ₹827.88 crore in the same period of the previous year, while Q4 consolidated revenue came in at ₹370.51 crore compared to ₹275.42 crore year-on-year.
Financial Performance
For the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the company reported a standalone net loss of ₹304.46 crore, with revenue from operations at ₹350.05 crore. The finance cost for the full year was ₹2,982.95 crore, reflecting the significant debt burden carried by the company. The total expenses for the year amounted to ₹4,382.21 crore. The following table summarises the annual standalone financial performance:
| Metric: | FY 2025-26 (₹ in crore) | FY 2024-25 (₹ in crore) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations: | 817.27 | 1,060.54 |
| Total Income: | 1,279.75 | 1,468.81 |
| Total Expenses: | 4,382.21 | 4,603.26 |
| Net Profit/(Loss): | (3,102.94) | (3,323.51) |
The consolidated Q4 performance showed an improvement year-on-year, with net loss narrowing to ₹306.95 crore from ₹827.88 crore, and revenue rising to ₹370.51 crore from ₹275.42 crore in the corresponding period of the previous year.
Board Decisions
The Board of Directors, in its meeting held on May 21, 2026, approved the audited standalone and consolidated financial results. Additionally, the Board appointed M/s. R.M. Bansal & Co. as the Cost Auditor for the financial year 2026-27 at a remuneration of ₹1,12,100, including GST.
In a key management change, the Board appointed Shri Vasudev Singh, GM (Finance) MTNL CO, as the new Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) effective May 21, 2026. He succeeds Shri Anirudh Prasad Singh, who ceased to be the CFO.
Auditor's Report
The statutory auditors, O.P. Bagla & Co. LLP and S.L. Chhajed & Co. LLP, issued an adverse opinion on the standalone and consolidated financial results. The auditors highlighted that the company's net worth has been fully eroded and it has incurred net cash losses during the current and previous years. Current liabilities substantially exceeded current assets as of the balance sheet date.
The report noted a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern. This is despite the Union Cabinet's approval of a revival plan involving debt restructuring, asset monetization, and a potential merger with BSNL. The auditors also cited non-compliance with certain accounting standards and pending reconciliations with BSNL and the Department of Telecommunications (DoT).
Historical Stock Returns for Mahanagar Telephone Nigam
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.61% | +1.78% | -7.35% | -23.78% | -34.12% | +69.52% |
What is the expected timeline for the Union Cabinet's approved MTNL-BSNL merger, and how might the ongoing debt restructuring process affect the valuation terms of the merger?
Given that MTNL's net worth has been fully eroded and auditors have flagged going concern doubts, what specific asset monetization targets is the government likely to prioritize to stabilize the company's financial position?
How might MTNL's declining revenue from operations — falling from ₹1,060 crore to ₹817 crore year-on-year — impact the government's ability to attract private investors or strategic partners as part of the revival plan?


































