Mphasis Receives Assessment Order and Tax Demand Notice of ₹2286.86 Crores for AY 2023-24
Mphasis Limited received an Assessment Order and tax demand notice of ₹2286.86 crores from the Income Tax Department on March 25, 2026, for Assessment Year 2023-24. The demand relates to additions in taxable income concerning ESOP expenses, overseas subcontractor payments without tax deduction, and GST turnover differences. Management expects no material financial impact and plans to file rectification petitions and appeals, expressing confidence in favorable outcomes based on pending Supreme Court cases and jurisdictional High Court precedents.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Mphasis Limited has received a significant tax assessment order and demand notice from the Income Tax Department, marking a notable regulatory development for the IT services company. The communication was received on March 25, 2026, and pertains to Assessment Year 2023-24.
Assessment Order Details
The company received an Assessment Order under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B along with a Notice of demand under Section 156 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The case was selected for scrutiny as per provisions of Section 143 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, leading to the current assessment proceedings.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Demand Amount | ₹2286.86 crores |
| Assessment Year | 2023-24 |
| Receipt Date | March 25, 2026 |
| Authority | Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department |
| Order Type | Section 143(3) read with Section 144B |
Key Tax Variations Identified
The assessment order contains several additions to taxable income that have resulted in the substantial demand notice. The Income Tax Department has identified specific areas of concern in the company's tax filings.
The primary variations include:
- ESOP Expenses: Disallowance of Employee Stock Option Plan expenses claimed by the company
- Subcontractor Payments: Issues related to payments made to overseas associated enterprises without deduction of tax at source
- GST Turnover Differences: Variations between GST turnover figures and those reported in Audited Financial Statements
Management Response and Financial Impact
Mphasis management has expressed confidence regarding the assessment order's implications. The company believes there is no material financial impact expected from this development. Management's position is supported by several factors that strengthen their case for appeal.
| Aspect | Management Position |
|---|---|
| Financial Impact | No material impact expected |
| Precedent Cases | Tax recurring issues pending in Supreme Court |
| Legal Support | Favorable precedents from jurisdictional High Court |
| Order Quality | Computational infirmities identified |
Planned Legal Actions
The company has outlined a comprehensive response strategy to address the assessment order. Mphasis plans to pursue multiple legal remedies to contest the demand notice.
The planned actions include:
- Filing a rectification petition to address computational errors in the order
- Evaluating legal remedies available under the Income Tax Act
- Filing an appropriate appeal against the assessment order
- Leveraging favorable precedents from higher courts
Regulatory Compliance
Mphasis has fulfilled its disclosure obligations under SEBI regulations by promptly informing the stock exchanges. The company submitted the required Form-A disclosure under Regulation 30 of SEBI Listing Regulations, ensuring complete transparency with investors and regulatory authorities.
The company has confirmed that no penalties, restrictions, or sanctions have been imposed pursuant to this communication, limiting the current impact to the tax demand itself. Based on preliminary assessment, management remains confident of achieving a favorable outcome at the appellate stage.
Historical Stock Returns for Mphasis
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.71% | -0.32% | -6.23% | -22.09% | -16.47% | +26.53% |
How might this tax dispute affect Mphasis' quarterly earnings guidance and cash flow management in the coming fiscal year?
Could this assessment order signal broader scrutiny of IT services companies' overseas subcontractor arrangements and ESOP expense treatments?
What impact might prolonged legal proceedings have on Mphasis' ability to pursue acquisitions or major capital investments?


































