Mega Flex Plastics FY26 Net Profit Rises 112% to ₹727 Lakh

1 min read     Updated on 23 May 2026, 05:42 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Naman SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Mega Flex Plastics Limited reported a 112.3% increase in net profit to ₹727.27 lakh for FY26, with revenue from operations rising 29.4% to ₹7,807.56 lakh. The board approved the audited results and re-appointed statutory auditors for the upcoming financial year.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
41083935

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Mega Flex Plastics Limited has announced its audited standalone financial results for the financial year ended March 31, 2026. The Board of Directors approved the financial statements during a meeting held on May 22, 2026. The company reported a significant improvement in profitability and revenue for the fiscal year.

Financial Performance

For the year ended March 31, 2026, the company recorded a net profit of ₹727.27 lakh, a sharp increase from ₹342.58 lakh in the previous year. This growth was driven by a 29.4% rise in revenue from operations, which reached ₹7,807.56 lakh compared to ₹6,030.75 lakh in FY25. Total revenue for the period stood at ₹8,063.90 lakh.

The company's earnings per share (EPS) on a basic basis improved to ₹6.00 for FY26, up from ₹2.82 in the previous year. Total expenses for the year increased to ₹7,092.81 lakh from ₹5,793.36 lakh, primarily due to higher material costs and operational expansion.

Balance Sheet Highlights

The company's balance sheet reflected a stronger financial position with total assets growing to ₹7,322.50 lakh as of March 31, 2026, up from ₹5,959.78 lakh a year earlier. Shareholders' funds increased to ₹6,247.46 lakh, driven by an accumulation of reserves and surplus which rose to ₹5,034.35 lakh.

Current investments saw a substantial rise, reaching ₹3,309.33 lakh compared to ₹1,408.11 lakh in the prior year. However, trade receivables decreased to ₹41.98 lakh from ₹133.27 lakh. The company maintained a healthy cash and cash equivalent balance of ₹498.49 lakh at the end of the fiscal year.

Key Financial Metrics

The following table summarizes the key financial figures for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, compared to the previous year:

Metric FY26 (₹ Lakh) FY25 (₹ Lakh)
Revenue from Operations 7,807.56 6,030.75
Total Revenue 8,063.90 6,251.98
Total Expenses 7,092.81 5,793.36
Profit for the Period 727.27 342.58
Basic EPS (₹) 6.00 2.82

Board Decisions and Appointments

Alongside the financial results, the board approved the re-appointment of M/s. Kanchan Jalan as the Secretarial Auditor and M/s. Vikash Chamaria & Co as the Internal Auditor for the financial year 2026-2027. The statutory auditors issued an unmodified opinion on the standalone financial results.

Historical Stock Returns for Mega Flex Plastics

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-4.98%-4.98%-12.45%+25.07%+108.80%+134.23%

Will Mega Flex Plastics sustain its ~113% profit growth trajectory in FY27, or were there one-time factors driving the sharp improvement in FY26?

How does the company plan to deploy its substantially increased current investments of ₹3,309.33 lakh, and could this signal an upcoming acquisition or capacity expansion?

Given the 29.4% revenue growth, is Mega Flex Plastics considering entering new product segments or geographies to maintain this momentum amid potential raw material price volatility?

Calcutta HC Rules Against Mega Flex Plastics in GST Dispute

1 min read     Updated on 22 May 2026, 12:47 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Jubin VScanX News Team
AI Summary

Mega Flex Plastics reported that the Calcutta High Court ruled its PP Leno bags fall under HSN 3923 2900, attracting an 18% GST rate. The company had paid ₹6,57,38,093 under protest for the differential demand and plans to file an SLP with the Supreme Court, stating no immediate financial impact.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
40979826

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

mega flex plastics has disclosed a material litigation update regarding a GST classification dispute following a judgment by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court on May 20, 2026. The case, titled Mega Flex Plastics Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., addresses the classification of polypropylene leno bags manufactured by the company.

Background of the Dispute

The dispute stems from an order dated October 25, 2018, by the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling. The authority classified PP Leno Bags under Heading 63053300, attracting a GST rate of 5% or 12%, rather than Chapter Heading 39232990, which attracts 18%. Consequently, the company made a payment under protest of ₹6,57,38,093 for the differential GST demand for the quarter ended December 31, 2024.

Court Judgment

The Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court has ruled that the polypropylene leno bags manufactured by the company fall under HSN 3923 2900. Consequently, the goods are taxable at the rate of 18%. The court's decision settles the classification dispute in favor of the tax authorities, overturning the company's previous classification claims.

Financial Impact and Future Action

The company stated that the disputed amount had already been paid under protest in FY 2018–2019. As Mega Flex Plastics intends to file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court of India against the judgment, it reported that there is presently no further financial impact resulting from the order.

Particular Details
Authority Hon'ble Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court
Date of Order 20-05-2026
Disputed Amount Paid ₹6,57,38,093
Tax Rate Upheld 18% (HSN 3923 2900)
Next Step Filing Special Leave Petition in Supreme Court

Historical Stock Returns for Mega Flex Plastics

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-4.98%-4.98%-12.45%+25.07%+108.80%+134.23%

If the Supreme Court upholds the 18% GST classification in the SLP, how significantly could the cumulative tax liability impact Mega Flex Plastics' profit margins and cash flow going forward?

How might a Supreme Court ruling on PP Leno Bag classification affect other manufacturers in the polypropylene packaging industry who may be similarly classifying their products under the lower tax bracket?

Could the Calcutta High Court's judgment prompt GST authorities to initiate retrospective tax demands on Mega Flex Plastics beyond the already disputed period, and what would be the potential financial exposure?

1 Year Returns:+108.80%