KIMS revenue rises 35% in Q1FY27, EBITDA up 20% on volume growth
KIMS saw consolidated revenue jump 35% YoY to ₹11,795 million in Q1FY27, with EBITDA rising 20% to ₹2,398 million. IP volumes surged 26.6% and OP visits grew 28.5%. However, net profit fell 56% to ₹374 million due to expansion costs and one-time impacts.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences reported a 35% year-on-year surge in consolidated operating revenue to ₹11,795 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (Q1FY27), driven by strong patient volume growth and the integration of new hospital assets. While consolidated net profit attributable to owners declined 56% year-on-year to ₹374 million due to higher operational costs from expansion, the group’s EBITDA rose 20% to ₹2,398 million. The results were approved by the Board on August 3, 2026, following a limited review by statutory auditors S.R. Batliboi & Associates LLP.
Financial Performance Highlights
The company’s standalone revenue from operations grew 29% year-on-year to ₹4,836 million. On a consolidated basis, total income reached ₹11,959 million. EBITDA expanded by 10.9% quarter-on-quarter to ₹2,398 million, reflecting improved operational leverage in mature units. However, profit before tax (PBT) fell 50.2% year-on-year to ₹566 million, impacted by the statutory impact of new Labour Codes (₹74 million in Q4FY26 vs current period adjustments) and fair valuation losses on call options. Consolidated net profit stood at ₹374 million, down from ₹850 million in Q1FY26.
| Metric | Standalone Q1FY27 (₹ Mn) | Consolidated Q1FY27 (₹ Mn) | YoY Change (Consolidated) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Revenue | 4,836 | 11,795 | +35.3% |
| Total Income | 5,143 | 11,959 | +36.1% |
| EBITDA | — | 2,398 | +20.1% |
| Net Profit | 665 | 374 | -56.0% |
| EPS (Basic) | ₹1.66 | ₹1.04 | -47.2% |
Operational Growth and Volume Metrics
Patient volumes drove the top-line growth, with inpatient (IP) admissions rising 26.6% year-on-year to 72,493 and outpatient (OP) visits increasing 28.5% to 658,617. Average Revenue Per Occupied Bed (ARPOB) increased 9.7% to ₹47,200, while Average Revenue Per Patient (ARPP) rose 6.8% to ₹163,573. The group’s bed capacity expanded to 7,459 beds, with operational beds reaching 5,639. Occupancy rate was 49.0%, slightly down from 52.5% in Q4FY26, as new units in Kerala and Maharashtra ramped up.
Regional Performance and New Units
Telangana remained the largest contributor, generating ₹6,235 million in revenue with an EBITDA margin of 29.5%. Andhra Pradesh contributed ₹2,634 million in revenue. Newer markets showed early traction: Kerala units generated ₹776 million in revenue with a 9.7% EBITDA margin, while Maharashtra units posted ₹1,504 million in revenue with a 7.5% EBITDA margin. Karnataka units continued to face headwinds, reporting an EBITDA loss of ₹192 million.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between robust revenue growth (+35%) and declining net profit (-56%) highlights the capital-intensive nature of KIMS’ expansion strategy. While EBITDA growth (+20%) confirms operational efficiency in core units, the bottom line is pressured by initial setup costs, higher finance expenses, and non-controlling interest impacts in newly acquired or managed facilities. The ramp-up of O&M units like Kompally and Guntur, which are already EBITDA positive, suggests improving returns on recent investments.
Source: https://lodr-files.dhan.co/lodr-inputs/Company/INE967H01025/03c9625b-d64b-4271-bdc4-2f62ac282f26.pdf
Historical Stock Returns for Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.98% | +2.85% | +0.74% | +38.25% | +9.24% | +221.96% |
How long is KIMS projecting the profitability dip to last as the new Kerala and Maharashtra units reach full operational capacity?
What specific strategies is management implementing to turn around the EBITDA losses in the Karnataka region?
Will the implementation of new Labour Codes lead to a permanent structural increase in operating costs, or are these one-time adjustments?


































