Kome-On Communication reports ₹89.42 lakh loss in FY26
Kome-On Communication reported a net loss of ₹89.42 lakh in FY26, up from ₹1.38 lakh in FY25, amid zero revenue. Expenditure rose to ₹88.99 lakh, driven by professional fees. The company is awaiting BSE approval for listing reinstatement after addressing compliance issues.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Kome-On Communication Limited (BSE: KOMEON) reported a net loss of ₹89.42 lakh for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, widening significantly from the ₹1.38 lakh loss posted in FY25. The company generated zero revenue from sales turnover and other income sources during the period.
Total expenditure for the year stood at ₹88.99 lakh, a sharp increase from the ₹1.38 lakh incurred in the preceding financial year. This rise in costs occurred against a backdrop of no operational income, leading to a profit before depreciation of negative ₹88.99 lakh. The company did not declare any dividend for the year.
Financial Performance
The financial results for FY26 highlight a complete absence of top-line growth alongside rising operational outflows. The key financial metrics are detailed below:
| Metric | FY26 | FY25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Turnover | ₹0.00 lakh | ₹0.00 lakh | - |
| Other Income | ₹0.00 lakh | ₹0.00 lakh | - |
| Total Expenditure | ₹88.99 lakh | ₹1.38 lakh | +₹87.61 lakh |
| Net Profit / (Loss) | (₹89.42) lakh | (₹1.38) lakh | Widened |
Note: Figures are in lakhs as per the annual report.
Expense Breakdown
The surge in total expenditure was largely driven by professional fees and compliance-related costs. According to the notes to the financial statements:
- Professional Fees: ₹80.66 lakh
- Listing Expenses: ₹3.49 lakh
- Other Expenses: ₹3.49 lakh (including audit fees of ₹0.30 lakh, rent of ₹0.10 lakh, and RTA charges of ₹1.91 lakh)
- Office Expenses: ₹0.37 lakh
Employee benefit expenses were minimal at ₹1.78 lakh, primarily comprising salaries. The company did not incur any depreciation charges during the year.
What the Numbers Show
The financial data reveals a critical divergence between revenue generation and cost structure. With zero sales turnover and zero other income, the company’s entire expenditure of ₹88.99 lakh represents a direct drag on equity. Professional fees alone accounted for approximately 90.6% of the total expenditure (₹80.66 lakh out of ₹88.99 lakh), indicating that the majority of cash outflows were related to advisory or compliance services rather than core operational activities. This concentration suggests the company is in a maintenance or restructuring phase with no active commercial operations generating cash flow.
Regulatory and Corporate Governance Updates
The Secretarial Audit Report disclosed significant regulatory developments regarding the company’s listing status. The Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) issued a Show Cause Notice on June 10, 2025, concerning the proposed compulsory delisting of the company’s equity shares under the SEBI (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2021.
Following a hearing before the Delisting Committee, the company received a delisting order on December 11, 2025, granting a four-month period until April 2026 to complete pending compliances. The company stated it has completed all pending compliance requirements and paid outstanding fines and penalties. An application for revocation of the suspension has been filed, and the company is awaiting final approval from BSE.
The Board of Directors, led by Managing Director Abhishek Suresh Kyal, also sought shareholder approval to enhance limits for making investments, loans, or guarantees under Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013. The proposed limit for such transactions is capped at ₹15 crore.
What is the current status of Kome-On Communication's application to revoke the BSE suspension, and what are the specific criteria for reinstatement?
How will the newly approved ₹15 crore limit for investments and loans under Section 186 impact the company's capital structure given its zero-revenue status?
What is the strategic rationale behind the sharp increase in professional fees, and are these costs associated with a specific restructuring or acquisition plan?































