K.S. Oils wins Kalash trademark dispute as court dismisses injunction
K.S. Oils Limited secured a legal victory as the Rohini District Court dismissed an injunction order against it concerning the Kalash trademark. The court's order on June 09, 2026, favours the company, which stated that its operations remain unaffected and the financial impact is not material.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
K.S. Oils Limited announced that the Rohini District Court has dismissed an injunction order against the company regarding the Kalash trademark. The order dated June 09, 2026, disposes of the application filed by the plaintiff. The company stated that its overall operations remain unaffected and the financial impact is not material.
The Hon'ble District Judge (Commercial Court) Rohini, who had earlier granted an injunction against the Company, has now dismissed the said injunction order in favour of K.S. Oils Limited. The matter pertains to the usage of the "Kalash" trademark pursuant to the order approved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on February 03, 2025.
The order was uploaded on June 09, 2026, and became available for viewing and downloading on June 10, 2026. The intimation was submitted to the exchanges pursuant to Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Details of the Order
| Sr. No. | Particulars | Details |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Name of Authority | Rohini District Court, New Delhi |
| 2. | Nature of action | Dismissal of injunction order in favour of K.S. Oils Limited |
| 3. | Date of order | June 09, 2026 |
| 4. | Violation details | Usage of "Kalash" trademark pursuant to NCLT order dated February 03, 2025 |
| 5. | Impact | Operations remain unaffected; financial impact not material |
Will the plaintiff appeal the Rohini District Court's decision to a higher judicial authority?
How will the resolution of this trademark dispute influence K.S. Oils' future marketing strategy for the 'Kalash' brand?
Does this legal victory set a precedent that will expedite the resolution of other pending intellectual property cases involving the company?




























