ixigo Receives Income Tax Assessment Order Demanding ₹45.49 Lakh for Assessment Year 2024-25
Le Travenues Technology (ixigo) received an Income Tax Assessment Order for AY 2024-25 demanding ₹45,49,685 tax on disallowed expenses of ₹1,01,50,336. The demand arose due to incomplete third-party responses during expense verification proceedings. The company identified calculation errors in the order, particularly the erroneous inclusion of ₹7,52,05,398 related to Buy Back tax that was already paid. ixigo expects nil financial implications and plans to file an appeal within the prescribed timeframe to contest the Assessment Order.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Le Travenues Technology (ixigo) has received an Income Tax Assessment Order for Assessment Year 2024-25, with the tax department demanding ₹45,49,685 on disallowed expenses. The travel technology company disclosed this development through a regulatory filing under SEBI Listing Regulations on March 25, 2026.
Assessment Order Details
The Income Tax Department issued the Assessment Order dated March 24, 2026, under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The order pertains to Assessment Year 2024-25, covering Financial Year 2023-24.
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Assessment Order Date: | March 24, 2026 |
| Receipt Date: | March 24, 2026, at 08:23 P.M. (IST) |
| Applicable Period: | Assessment Year 2024-25 (FY 2023-24) |
| Issuing Authority: | Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance |
Financial Implications
The assessment proceedings resulted in specific financial demands against the company. During the usual assessment process, the Assessing Officer issued notices under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act to third parties for independent verification of claimed expenses.
| Financial Impact: | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|
| Disallowed Expenses: | 1,01,50,336 |
| Tax Demanded: | 45,49,685 |
| Buy Back Tax Amount: | 7,52,05,398 |
The complications arose when one party failed to respond to the Assessing Officer's notice, while another provided an incomplete response. Consequently, the Assessing Officer disallowed expenses worth ₹1,01,50,336 and demanded tax of ₹45,49,685 on this amount.
Calculation Discrepancies
The company has identified what it considers significant errors in the Assessment Order. The Assessing Officer included ₹7,52,05,398 pertaining to tax on Buy Back of Shares under Section 115QA in the Demand Notice. However, this amount has already been paid and is properly captured in the computation sheet shared along with the Demand Notice.
Despite having complete facts on record, this amount appears to have been erroneously included in the Demand Notice even though it was already paid.
Company's Response Strategy
Le Travenues Technology believes it has a strong case on merits and plans to contest the Assessment Order. The company expects nil financial implications except for legal and other expenses to be incurred in contesting the matter.
Planned Actions:
- File requisite appeal with appropriate authorities within prescribed timeframe
- Contest the Assessment Order based on identified calculation errors
- Challenge the inclusion of already-paid Buy Back tax amount
Penalty Proceedings
The Demand Notice references penalty proceedings under Section 270A and Section 271AAC(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961. The company maintains its position that it has a strong case on merits and will file the requisite appeal within the prescribed time to contest these proceedings as well.
The disclosure was made in compliance with Regulation 30 of the SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015, ensuring transparency with stakeholders regarding this regulatory development.
Historical Stock Returns for Le Travenues Technology (IXIGO)
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.23% | +8.78% | +9.92% | -34.93% | +27.89% | -1.71% |
How might this tax dispute impact Le Travenues Technology's quarterly financial results and cash flow management in the coming quarters?
What precedent could this assessment order set for other travel technology companies regarding expense verification and third-party compliance?
Will the ongoing appeal process affect Le Travenues Technology's ability to secure future funding or partnerships in the competitive travel tech sector?


































